(1)If, on the application of the [F2828appropriate regulatorF2828] or the Secretary of State, the court is satisfied—
(a)that there is a reasonable likelihood that any person will contravene a relevant requirement, or
(b)that any person has contravened a relevant requirement and that there is a reasonable likelihood that the contravention will continue or be repeated,
the court may make an order restraining (or in Scotland an interdict prohibiting) the contravention.
(2)If on the application of the [F2828appropriate regulatorF2828] or the Secretary of State the court is satisfied—
(a)that any person has contravened a relevant requirement, and
(b)that there are steps which could be taken for remedying the contravention,
the court may make an order requiring that person, and any other person who appears to have been knowingly concerned in the contravention, to take such steps as the court may direct to remedy it.
(3)If, on the application of the [F2828appropriate regulatorF2828] or the Secretary of State, the court is satisfied that any person may have—
(a)contravened a relevant requirement, or
(b)been knowingly concerned in the contravention of such a requirement,
it may make an order restraining (or in Scotland an interdict prohibiting) him from disposing of, or otherwise dealing with, any assets of his which it is satisfied he is reasonably likely to dispose of or otherwise deal with.
(4)The jurisdiction conferred by this section is exercisable by the High Court and the Court of Session.
(5)In subsection (2), references to remedying a contravention include references to mitigating its effect.
(6) “Relevant requirement”—
(a)in relation to an application by the [F2829appropriate regulatorF2829] , means a requirement—
(i)F2832[F2830 which is imposed by or under this Act or by a [F2831 qualifying provisionF2831] specified, or of a description specified, for the purposes of this subsection by the Treasury by orderF2830] ...
(ii)which is imposed by or under any other Act and whose contravention constitutes an offence [F2833mentioned in section 402(1)F2833] ; F2834[F2835...
(iii)which is imposed by the Alternative Investment Fund Managers Regulations 2013;F2835]F2836[F2837 ...
(iv)which is imposed by Part 7 of the Financial Services Act 2012 (offences relating to financial services) and whose contravention constitutes an offence under that Part;F2837][F2838 orF2838]
[F2839 (v)which is imposed by a provision made in accordance with the transparency obligations directive (within the meaning of section 103(1));F2839][F2840 , or
(vi)which is imposed by the Undertakings for Collective Investment in Transferable Securities Regulations 2011.F2840]
(b)in relation to an application by the Secretary of State, means a requirement which is imposed by or under this Act and whose contravention constitutes an offence which the Secretary of State has power to prosecute under this Act.
(7)In the application of subsection (6) to Scotland—
F2841 (a). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(b) in paragraph (b) omit “which the Secretary of State has power to prosecute under this Act”.
[F2842 (8) The PRA is the “appropriate regulator” in the case of a contravention of—
(a)a requirement that is imposed by the PRA under any provision of this Act,
(b)a requirement under section 56(6) where the authorised person concerned is a PRA-authorised person and the prohibition order concerned is made by the PRA, or
(c)a requirement under section 59(1) or (2) where the authorised person concerned is a PRA-authorised person and the approval concerned falls to be given by the PRA.
(9) In the case of a contravention of a requirement that is imposed by a [F2843 qualifying provision F2843] , “the appropriate regulator” is whichever of the PRA or the FCA (or both) is specified by the Treasury by order in relation to the [F2843 qualifying provision F2843] for the purposes of this section.
(10) In the case of a contravention of a requirement where the contravention constitutes an offence under this Act, the “appropriate regulator” is whichever of the PRA or the FCA has power to prosecute the offence (see section 401).
(11) The FCA is the “appropriate regulator” in the case of a contravention of any other requirement [F2844 , other than a case falling within paragraph 26 of Schedule 17A F2844] .
(12) The Treasury may by order amend the definition of “appropriate regulator”. F2842]
659.This section sets out the powers of the court to make injunctive orders on the application of the Authority or Secretary of State and the grounds on which they may exercise those powers. The court may make three types of order: an order restraining the contravention of certain requirements (subsection (1)), an order directing remedial action to be taken when there has been such a contravention (subsection (2)) and an order freezing the assets of someone who has contravened certain requirements or been knowingly involved in a contravention (subsection (3)).
660.The first of these is a preventative measure. Undersubsection (1)(a) an order can be made restraining a person from contravening a requirement where the court believes they are reasonably likely to do so. Where a contravention has already occurred, under subsection (1)(b) the courts can restrain a person from doing so again.
661.Where there are clear steps that can be taken either by the person who has contravened a requirement or by a person knowingly concerned in the contravention, under subsection (2) the court may order a person to take those steps. This is a corrective power. For example, an order may simply require a person to meet commitments they have entered into but so far failed to discharge. Subsection (5) provides that the remedial action that the court may order under subsection (2) may include orders to mitigate the impact of a contravention even if it is not, strictly speaking, possible to remedy it. For example where a person has published a misleading advertisement, the Authority could apply to the court for an order requiring the person to publish a correction. This would not be of use to anyone who had taken action on the basis of the original advertisement but would prevent others doing so in the future.
662.An order made undersubsection (3) to freeze a person’s assets is similar to a Mareva injunction apart from its timing: a Mareva injunction may only be applied for where court proceedings have been commenced or are imminent whereas this section gives the Authority or Secretary of State an independent power to apply to the court for an asset-freezing order on the grounds that they believe a breach may have occurred. The power does not prevent separate applications for Mareva injunctions.
663.Subsection (6) sets out the range of requirements the contravention or likely contravention of which may be grounds for an order under this section. These are requirements imposed by or under the Act, including the Authority’s rules made under Part X, plus the various requirements a breach of which constitutes an offence under the Act, such as the general prohibition under Part II. In addition, the powers may be exercised for breaches of requirements imposed by other Acts which constitute offences which the Authority has power to prosecute. The Authority’s power in that respect is set out in section 402.