(1)[F494 A regulatorF494] may take action against a person under this section [F495(whether or not it has given its approval in relation to the person)F495] if—
(a)it appears to the [F496regulatorF496] that he is guilty of misconduct; and
(b)the [F497regulatorF497] is satisfied that it is appropriate in all the circumstances to take action against him.
[F498 (1A)For provision about when a person is guilty of misconduct for the purposes of action by a regulator—
(a)see section 66A, in the case of action by the FCA, and
(b)see section 66B, in the case of action by the PRA.F498]
F499 (2). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
F500 (2A). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(3)If the [F501regulatorF501] is entitled to take action under this section against a person, [F502it may do one or more of the following—F502] —
(a)impose a penalty on him of such amount as it considers appropriate;
[F503 (aa)suspend, for such period as it considers appropriate, any approval of the performance by him of any function to which the approval relates;
[F504 (ab)impose, for such period as it considers appropriate, any conditions in relation to any such approval which it considers appropriate;
(ac)limit the period for which any such approval is to have effect;F504]
(b)publish a statement of his misconduct.
[F505 (3A)The period for which a suspension or [F506 conditionF506] is to have effect may not exceed two years.
(3B)A suspension [F507 , condition or limitationF507] may have effect in relation to part of a function.
(3C)A [F508 conditionF508] may, in particular, be imposed so as to require any person to take, or refrain from taking, specified action.
(3D)[F509 The regulator taking action under this sectionF509] may—
(a)withdraw a suspension [F510 , condition or limitationF510] ; F511...
(b)vary a suspension or [F512 conditionF512] so as to reduce the period for which it has effect or otherwise to limit its effect.
[F513 (c)vary a limitation so as to increase the period for which the approval is to have effect.F513,F505]]
(4)[F514 A regulatorF514] may not take action under this section after the end of the [F515 relevant periodF515] beginning with the first day on which [F516 the regulatorF516] knew of the misconduct, unless proceedings in respect of it against the person concerned were begun before the end of that period.
(5)For the purposes of subsection (4)—
(a)[F517 a regulatorF517] is to be treated as knowing of misconduct if it has information from which the misconduct can reasonably be inferred; and
(b)proceedings against a person in respect of misconduct are to be treated as begun when a warning notice is given to him under section 67(1).
[F518 (5ZA) “The relevant period” is—
(a)in relation to misconduct which occurs before the day on which this subsection comes into force, the period of 3 years, and
(b)in relation to misconduct which occurs on or after that day, the period of 6 years.F518]
[F519 (5A) “Approval” means an approval given under section 59. F519]
F520 (6). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
F521 (7). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
[F522 (8)In relation to any time while a suspension is in force under subsection (3)(aa) in relation to part of a function, any reference in section 59 or 63A to the performance of a function includes the performance of part of a function.
(9)If at any time a [F523 conditionF523] imposed under subsection (3)(ab) is contravened, the approval in relation to the person concerned is to be treated for the purposes of sections 59 and 63A as if it had been withdrawn at that time.F522,F503]]
147.This section gives the Authority a power to take disciplinary action against an approved person when the two conditions set out in subsection (1) have been met. The Authority must be satisfied that it is appropriate to take action against him. In this context, the Authority would have to have regard, among other things, to its regulatory objectives set out in Part I. The Authority would need to take into account whether disciplinary action against the approved person, rather than action against the authorised person for whom he works, would be appropriate, taking into account the responsibility of the senior management of the firm for the conduct of the firm and its employees. A second important factor would be to ensure that any action, or any particular course of action, it takes should be proportionate to the nature and seriousness of the misconduct.
148.In addition, the Authority must be satisfied that the person has engaged in misconduct, as defined in subsection (2). One possibility is that the approved person has acted in breach of a statement of principle, issued under section 64, as evidenced by a breach of a code of practice. The other possible situation is that an approved person has been knowingly involved in a breach by the authorised firm of rules made by the Authority or of any requirement imposed by or under the Act.
149.Subsection (3) gives the Authority powers to impose a penalty on an approved person or to make a public statement about their misconduct.
150.Subsection (4) restricts the period during which the Authority may take action under this section to a period of two years after the Authority became aware of the misconduct. This period reflects the time available to the Secretary of State to bring disqualification proceedings against a company director under the Company Directors Disqualification Act 1986.