42(1)This paragraph applies to a company in administration.
(2)No resolution may be passed for the winding up of the company.
(3)No order may be made for the winding up of the company.
(4)Sub-paragraph (3) does not apply to an order made on a petition presented under—
(a)section 124A (public interest), or
(aa)section 124B (SEs),
(b)section 367 of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (c. 8) (petition by Financial Conduct Authority or Prudential Regulation Authority ).
(5)If a petition presented under a provision referred to in sub-paragraph (4) comes to the attention of the administrator, he shall apply to the court for directions under paragraph 63.
Cases considering Schedule B1, paragraph 42 11
[2017] EWHC 2405 (Ch) · 31 August 2017
Recognises the administrators’ discretion concerning a receiver’s vacation of office, but the exercise of that discretion was assessed against the secured creditor’s interests and the rationality of the decision (see paras [27], [49]-[51]).
[2012] EWHC 2398 (Ch) · 23 August 2012Limits
The court interpreted the provision as preventing a winding-up order while the company remained in administration. The administration therefore had to be terminated before the winding-up order could be made. (see para [73])
[2011] EWHC 2860 (Ch) · 2 November 2011Disapplies
Applied through paragraph 44 to prohibit a winding-up resolution during the interim moratorium. The members’ resolution was therefore invalid.
Applied to the members’ resolution for voluntary liquidation. Because the paragraph 44 moratorium was in force, no such resolution could validly be passed.
What each judgment says about Schedule B1, paragraph 42 is in the case-law panel in the full Act.