43(1)This paragraph applies to a company in administration.
(2)No step may be taken to enforce security over the company’s property except—
(a)with the consent of the administrator, or
(b)with the permission of the court.
(3)No step may be taken to repossess goods in the company’s possession under a hire-purchase agreement except—
(a)with the consent of the administrator, or
(b)with the permission of the court.
Cases considering Schedule B1, paragraph 43 80
[2016] EWCA Civ 103 · 25 February 2016Interprets
The moratorium covers only legal process against the company. It does not restrict essentially defensive steps, a joinder application seeking no relief against a claimant company, an appeal retaining that character, or an incidental costs order (see paras [15]-[17]; [25]-[31]).
[2009] EWCA Civ 632 · 26 June 2009Interprets
In construing Paragraph 43(6), the court had regard to Paragraph 43(5) and considered that the legal-process restriction was confined to the United Kingdom. It did not finally decide the point (see para [21]).
The court considered that the prohibition on legal process was probably confined to domestic process, but did not decide the issue finally. Its territorial limits did not restrict the court’s equitable jurisdiction to protect an administration (see paras [20]-[22]).
[2008] EWCA Civ 1321 · 18 November 2008
The court treated subparagraphs (4) and (6) as showing that administration may preclude a landlord from enforcing lease terms unless the administrator consents or the court gives permission. (see para [66])
The court applied the statutory bar on proceedings against a company or its property in administration. It exercised the discretion afresh and refused permission because the Atlantic balancing exercise strongly favoured creditors over the landlord’s limited loss. (see paras [48]; [53]; [66]-[68])
60 more judgments, and what each says about Schedule B1, paragraph 43, are in the
case-law panel in the full Act.