Law firm

Adams & Remers LLP

Adams & Remers LLP is named as solicitors in at least 16 UK judgments from 2008 to 2024, most often in trusts, wills and private client and company and partnership.

16
judgments
3
in the last five years
6
in the Court of Appeal

Practice areas

  • Trusts, wills and private client6
  • Company and partnership5
  • Media, defamation and privacy1
  • Real estate1
  • Commercial disputes1
  • Tax1
  • Personal injury1
  • Intellectual property1

Courts

  • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)6
  • High Court10

Judgments by year

  • 20260
  • 20250
  • 20242
  • 20231
  • 20220
  • 20210
  • 20201
  • 20192
  • 20181
  • 20170
  • 20162
  • 20152
  • 20141
  • 20131
  • 20120
  • 20111
  • 20100
  • 20090
  • 20082

Cases later courts cite most

Cases Adams & Remers LLP acted in that later judgments cite most often.

Date Case Cited by
30 Apr 2015
[2015] EWHC 1170 (QB) · High Court: Queen's Bench Division
On a medical adjournment application, the court must exercise its case-management discretion under the overriding objective. It should require cogent evidence…
22
22 May 2014
[2014] EWHC 1587 (Ch) · High Court: Chancery Division
A company director’s sole ownership of the shares does not authorise him to misapply company property, particularly where the company is insolvent or…
3

Recent cases

Date Case Cited by
18 Apr 2024
[2024] EWHC 1755 (Ch) · High Court: Chancery Division
Where an interim injunction application is not substantively heard and the hearing instead serves to organise evidence and timetable the future application…
15 Mar 2024
[2024] EWHC 560 (Ch) · High Court: Chancery Division
The court has a broad discretion to permit amendments, balancing injustice to the applicant against injustice to the respondent and applying the overriding…
6 Apr 2023
[2023] EWHC 807 (Ch) · High Court: Chancery Division
An appellate court should interfere with a discretionary order for security for costs only where the first-instance judge exceeded the permissible ambit of…
1
25 Sep 2020
[2020] EWHC 2515 (Comm) · High Court: Commercial Court
Exclusive jurisdiction under Article 24 of the Regulation (EU) No. 1215/2012 requires a strict assessment of the principal subject matter of the proceedings. A…
10 Sep 2019
[2019] EWHC 2416 (Ch) · High Court: Chancery Division
Rectification of a voluntary settlement for mistake requires convincing evidence of the settlor’s or trustees’ specific intention, an operative drafting…
12 Apr 2019
[2019] EWHC 941 (Ch) · High Court: Chancery Division
A guarantor’s direct guarantee of an assignee’s lease obligations is ineffective under the Landlord and Tenant (Covenants) Act 1995. A guarantee of the former…
15 Nov 2018
[2018] EWHC 3061 (Ch) · High Court: Chancery Division
A partnership may be dissolved even where the parties have not agreed every consequential accounting matter. Assets not shown to have been allocated on…
4 May 2016
[2016] EWCA Civ 439 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
An appeal should not be reopened merely because the appellate court acknowledges a limited error or because an unsuccessful party remains dissatisfied with the…
13 Apr 2016
[2016] EWCA Civ 371 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
A director’s duty to avoid conflicts of interest under the Companies Act 2006 covers diversion of a company opportunity, whether or not the company could have…
1
16 Jun 2015
[2015] EWCA Civ 586 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
In negligence, the precise mechanism or medical consequence of an injury need not be foreseeable if personal injury of the relevant general kind was reasonably…
30 Apr 2015
[2015] EWHC 1170 (QB) · High Court: Queen's Bench Division
On a medical adjournment application, the court must exercise its case-management discretion under the overriding objective. It should require cogent evidence…
22
22 May 2014
[2014] EWHC 1587 (Ch) · High Court: Chancery Division
A company director’s sole ownership of the shares does not authorise him to misapply company property, particularly where the company is insolvent or…
3

Based on judgments published by The National Archives (Find Case Law) in which Adams & Remers LLP is named as solicitors, counted under the firm's current name. The figures are minimums: not every judgment names the solicitors, and a judgment is counted only when we are confident who acted. The selection of cases listed here is limited, and does not include family, criminal or anonymised cases. Firm details include data from the Solicitors Regulation Authority. zoomLaw is independent and not connected with Adams & Remers LLP. Something wrong or missing? Tell us. All law firms.