Practice areas
Courts
Judgments by year
Cases later courts cite most
Cases Ahmed & Co acted in that later judgments cite most often.
| Date | Case | Cited by |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Nov 2009 |
[2009] EWHC 2927 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
Article 6 applies to control-order proceedings where the order directly restricts an individual’s rights and freedoms. The fact that the obligations are…
|
7 |
| 30 Jun 2017 |
[2017] EWHC 1529 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
A review of a TPIM under TPIMA 2011 requires separate consideration of whether Conditions A, C and D were met and continue to be met. Condition A concerns the…
|
5 |
Recent cases
| Date | Case | Cited by |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Feb 2021 |
[2021] EWHC 266 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
On a statutory review of terrorism prevention and investigation measures, the court must review whether the statutory conditions continue to be satisfied…
|
|
| 5 Jun 2018 |
[2018] EWHC 1664 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
Disclosure from proceedings involving sensitive national-security material is not ordered merely because the material may assist related family proceedings.…
|
|
| 30 Jun 2017 |
[2017] EWHC 1529 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
A review of a TPIM under TPIMA 2011 requires separate consideration of whether Conditions A, C and D were met and continue to be met. Condition A concerns the…
|
5 |
| 11 Nov 2009 |
[2009] EWHC 2927 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
Article 6 applies to control-order proceedings where the order directly restricts an individual’s rights and freedoms. The fact that the obligations are…
|
7 |
| 20 Mar 2007 |
[2007] EWHC 564 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
Under Part 2 of the Extradition Act 2003, an arrest warrant need not reproduce every offence in the indictment where the warrant and indictment, read together…
|
1 |
| 5 Sep 2006 |
[2006] EWHC 2396 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
A detainee’s right to legal advice of choice is fundamental, but it is not absolute. The police may exclude a particular legal adviser where there are…
|
Based on judgments published by The National Archives (Find Case Law) in which Ahmed & Co is named as solicitors, counted under the firm's current name. The figures are minimums: not every judgment names the solicitors, and a judgment is counted only when we are confident who acted. The selection of cases listed here is limited, and does not include family, criminal or anonymised cases. Firm details include data from the Solicitors Regulation Authority. zoomLaw is independent and not connected with Ahmed & Co. Something wrong or missing? Tell us. All law firms.