Practice areas
Courts
Counsel most often instructed
Judgments by year
Cases later courts cite most
Cases Coninghams Solicitors acted in that later judgments cite most often.
| Date | Case | Cited by |
|---|---|---|
| 24 Jul 2024 |
[2024] EWCA Civ 861 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
A Category A prisoner has no general right to comment on the Local Advisory Panel’s recommendation before the Category A Team decides the annual review. PSI…
|
5 |
| 23 Jan 2020 |
[2020] EWCA Civ 29 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
A prisoner has no unqualified right to attend a civil hearing physically. The court must determine whether participation by video link permits the prisoner to…
|
5 |
Recent cases
| Date | Case | Cited by |
|---|---|---|
| 24 Jul 2024 |
[2024] EWCA Civ 861 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
A Category A prisoner has no general right to comment on the Local Advisory Panel’s recommendation before the Category A Team decides the annual review. PSI…
|
5 |
| 14 Jul 2023 |
[2023] EWCA Civ 842 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
Under rule 53A of the Prison Rules 1999, a governor must refer a charge to an Independent Adjudicator where it is so serious that additional days would be…
|
|
| 13 Oct 2022 |
[2022] EWHC 2577 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
In a Category A prisoner’s annual review, procedural fairness does not ordinarily require an oral hearing merely because the prisoner disputes reports or…
|
|
| 23 Mar 2021 |
[2021] EWHC 673 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
An Independent Adjudicator is not required to investigate or review the reasons why a Prison Governor referred disciplinary charges under rule 53A of the…
|
|
| 23 Jan 2020 |
[2020] EWCA Civ 29 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
A prisoner has no unqualified right to attend a civil hearing physically. The court must determine whether participation by video link permits the prisoner to…
|
5 |
| 26 Oct 2018 |
[2018] EWHC 2820 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
Article 5(4) requires the Parole Board to review post-tariff detention at reasonable intervals. The Secretary of State’s target date is an important starting…
|
1 |
| 24 Feb 2017 |
[2017] EWHC 266 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
Whether procedural fairness requires an oral hearing in a prisoner’s categorisation review depends on the facts and the importance of what is at stake.…
|
1 |
| 8 Mar 2011 |
[2011] EWHC 423 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
When deciding whether to extend time for an appeal against a police complaints determination, the decision-maker must assess whether the case’s special…
|
|
| 1 Dec 2009 |
[2009] EWHC 3492 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
A Parole Board decision must be read as a whole and in its context. A single infelicitous sentence does not establish an error of law when the decision…
|
|
| 3 Jun 2008 |
[2008] EWHC 1371 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
Failure to retain and produce physical evidence in prison disciplinary proceedings does not automatically prevent reliance on that evidence. The adjudicator…
|
Based on judgments published by The National Archives (Find Case Law) in which Coninghams Solicitors is named as solicitors, counted under the firm's current name. The figures are minimums: not every judgment names the solicitors, and a judgment is counted only when we are confident who acted. The selection of cases listed here is limited, and does not include family, criminal or anonymised cases. Firm details include data from the Solicitors Regulation Authority. zoomLaw is independent and not connected with Coninghams Solicitors. Something wrong or missing? Tell us. All law firms.