Practice areas
Courts
Counsel most often instructed
Judgments by year
Cases later courts cite most
Cases Fountain Solicitors acted in that later judgments cite most often.
| Date | Case | Cited by |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Oct 2015 |
[2015] UKSC 59 · Supreme Court
A public authority must determine an application under the lawful policy it has adopted unless there is good reason to depart from it. This public law duty…
|
65 |
| 7 Jun 2013 |
[2013] EWHC 1426 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
Where national-security material relied on in refusing naturalisation is protected by public interest immunity, the common-law duty of fairness does not…
|
17 |
| 18 Mar 2015 |
[2015] EWHC 681 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
On statutory judicial review by the Special Immigration Appeals Commission, closed disclosure must enable the Commission to test the rationality and legality…
|
5 |
| 31 Mar 2016 |
[2016] UKUT 228 (IAC) · Upper Tribunal: Immigration and Asylum Chamber
The Tribunal’s slip-rule power is confined to correcting clerical mistakes and accidental slips or omissions so as to make the original decision-maker’s…
|
4 |
| 18 Jun 2014 |
[2014] EWCA Civ 826 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
Whether ill-treatment is capable of constituting persecution is a question of law. Whether particular ill-treatment constitutes persecution is a mixed question…
|
3 |
Recent cases
| Date | Case | Cited by |
|---|---|---|
| 26 Jun 2026 |
[2026] EWCA Civ 807 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
In an appeal concerning revocation of refugee status, statutory presumptions that a person convicted of a particularly serious crime is a danger to the…
|
|
| 22 Jan 2019 |
[2019] EWHC 70 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
A sincere religious belief is protected by Article 9 where the proposed conduct is sufficiently linked to that belief. A court should avoid adjudicating…
|
2 |
| 31 Mar 2016 |
[2016] UKUT 228 (IAC) · Upper Tribunal: Immigration and Asylum Chamber
The Tribunal’s slip-rule power is confined to correcting clerical mistakes and accidental slips or omissions so as to make the original decision-maker’s…
|
4 |
| 14 Oct 2015 |
[2015] UKSC 59 · Supreme Court
A public authority must determine an application under the lawful policy it has adopted unless there is good reason to depart from it. This public law duty…
|
65 |
| 1 May 2015 |
[2015] EWHC 1236 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
On a review under sections 2C or 2D of the Special Immigration Appeals Commission Act 1997, the Secretary of State must disclose under Rule 10B of the Special…
|
|
| 18 Mar 2015 |
[2015] EWHC 681 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
On statutory judicial review by the Special Immigration Appeals Commission, closed disclosure must enable the Commission to test the rationality and legality…
|
5 |
| 18 Jun 2014 |
[2014] EWCA Civ 826 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
Whether ill-treatment is capable of constituting persecution is a question of law. Whether particular ill-treatment constitutes persecution is a mixed question…
|
3 |
| 16 May 2014 |
[2014] EWHC 1772 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
For certification under section 96 of the Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002, a claimant cannot invalidate certification merely by identifying later…
|
|
| 7 Jun 2013 |
[2013] EWHC 1426 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
Where national-security material relied on in refusing naturalisation is protected by public interest immunity, the common-law duty of fairness does not…
|
17 |
| 26 Jul 2012 |
[2012] EWHC 2789 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
A discrimination challenge to Immigration Rules requires a comparator class whose members are in materially analogous circumstances. Union citizens who have…
|
2 |
| 13 Jul 2012 |
[2012] EWHC 1943 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
The compatibility of a statutory disclosure power with Article 8 must be assessed by examining the entire legal framework, including related legislation…
|
Based on judgments published by The National Archives (Find Case Law) in which Fountain Solicitors is named as solicitors, counted under the firm's current name. The figures are minimums: not every judgment names the solicitors, and a judgment is counted only when we are confident who acted. The selection of cases listed here is limited, and does not include family, criminal or anonymised cases. Firm details include data from the Solicitors Regulation Authority. zoomLaw is independent and not connected with Fountain Solicitors. Something wrong or missing? Tell us. All law firms.