Practice areas
Courts
Counsel most often instructed
Judgments by year
Cases later courts cite most
Cases Hallinan Blackburn Gittings & Nott acted in that later judgments cite most often.
| Date | Case | Cited by |
|---|---|---|
| 23 Nov 2007 |
[2007] EWHC 2754 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
Under section 14 of the Extradition Act 2003, deliberate flight from the requesting state to avoid prosecution ordinarily prevents reliance on delay as making…
|
10 |
| 8 Apr 2009 |
[2009] EWHC 770 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
Extradition under the Extradition Act 2003 is incompatible with Article 6 where there is a real risk of a flagrant denial of justice in the requesting state. A…
|
6 |
| 28 Jul 2017 |
[2017] EWHC 1912 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
Extradition may be barred under Article 6 where there is a real risk of a flagrant denial of justice. The test requires more than ordinary procedural defects…
|
6 |
| 20 Apr 2011 |
[2011] EWHC 943 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
An extradition hearing may proceed in the requested person’s absence where the person is represented. Representation is treated as presence unless an enactment…
|
3 |
| 19 Dec 2006 |
[2006] EWHC 3486 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
In an extradition warrant, the alleged conduct must be identified with sufficient certainty, but the court need not impose the technical detail required in an…
|
3 |
Recent cases
| Date | Case | Cited by |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Dec 2018 |
[2018] EWHC 3479 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
Further information supplied under the extradition framework may reduce the offences for which surrender is sought, provided the warrant remains sufficiently…
|
|
| 28 Jul 2017 |
[2017] EWHC 1912 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
Extradition may be barred under Article 6 where there is a real risk of a flagrant denial of justice. The test requires more than ordinary procedural defects…
|
6 |
| 21 Dec 2016 |
[2016] EWHC 3288 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
For section 85(5) of the Extradition Act 2003, an effective legal entitlement to a retrial may remain subject to procedural steps, including proof that the…
|
1 |
| 27 Mar 2014 |
[2014] EWHC 889 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
A magistrates’ court conducting an extradition hearing cannot receive and rely on evidence tendered by one party which is not disclosed to the other, unless…
|
1 |
| 20 Apr 2011 |
[2011] EWHC 943 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
An extradition hearing may proceed in the requested person’s absence where the person is represented. Representation is treated as presence unless an enactment…
|
3 |
| 4 Nov 2009 |
[2009] EWHC 2740 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
Under section 11(3) of the Extradition Act 1989, an applicant must be discharged where the accusation is not made in good faith in the interests of justice and…
|
|
| 8 Apr 2009 |
[2009] EWHC 770 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
Extradition under the Extradition Act 2003 is incompatible with Article 6 where there is a real risk of a flagrant denial of justice in the requesting state. A…
|
6 |
| 8 Apr 2009 |
[2009] EWHC 1473 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
A certification application will be refused where the proposed question does not arise on the material facts found by the court. A later authority on Article 6…
|
2 |
| 4 Mar 2009 |
[2009] EWHC 383 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
For an extradition warrant to comply with section 2(4)(c) of the Extradition Act 2003, it must give sufficient information to identify what the requested…
|
1 |
| 10 Jun 2008 |
[2008] EWHC 1550 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
An extradition appeal may be adjourned to allow the requesting state a further opportunity to provide evidence on whether the statutory and Convention…
|
|
| 23 Nov 2007 |
[2007] EWHC 2754 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
Under section 14 of the Extradition Act 2003, deliberate flight from the requesting state to avoid prosecution ordinarily prevents reliance on delay as making…
|
10 |
| 6 Feb 2007 |
[2007] EWHC 666 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
Where a requesting authority withdraws an extradition request in relation to one of several offences before extradition, the appropriate judge must discharge…
|
Based on judgments published by The National Archives (Find Case Law) in which Hallinan Blackburn Gittings & Nott is named as solicitors, counted under the firm's current name. The figures are minimums: not every judgment names the solicitors, and a judgment is counted only when we are confident who acted. The selection of cases listed here is limited, and does not include family, criminal or anonymised cases. Firm details include data from the Solicitors Regulation Authority. zoomLaw is independent and not connected with Hallinan Blackburn Gittings & Nott. Something wrong or missing? Tell us. All law firms.