Practice areas
Courts
Counsel most often instructed
Judgments by year
Cases later courts cite most
Cases Hawkswell Kilvington acted in that later judgments cite most often.
| Date | Case | Cited by |
|---|---|---|
| 29 Jun 2015 |
[2015] EWHC 1855 (TCC) · High Court: Technology and Construction Court
Adjudication decisions are generally enforced without reopening issues decided by the adjudicator. An exception arises where the issue is short, self-contained…
|
13 |
| 1 Sep 2009 |
[2009] EWHC 2218 (TCC) · High Court: Technology and Construction Court
An adjudicator’s jurisdiction is defined by the disputed claim referred, not by every argument or item of evidence advanced. A broad claim may encompass…
|
7 |
| 24 Aug 2023 |
[2023] EWHC 2152 (TCC) · High Court: Technology and Construction Court
A Part 8 claim is appropriate for a discrete question unlikely to involve a substantial dispute of fact, especially a contractual construction issue capable of…
|
5 |
| 4 May 2020 |
[2020] EWHC 1305 (TCC) · High Court: Technology and Construction Court
Adjudication exists to secure interim cash flow. An adjudicator’s decision will ordinarily be enforced by summary judgment where the adjudicator had…
|
4 |
| 23 May 2016 |
[2016] EWHC 1148 (TCC) · High Court: Technology and Construction Court
An adjudication clause covering disputes arising under or in connection with a construction subcontract may extend to a dispute about whether the parties…
|
3 |
| 24 Nov 2015 |
[2015] EWHC 3352 (TCC) · High Court: Technology and Construction Court
In a hybrid construction contract, the Housing Grants (Construction and Regeneration) Act 1996 applies only to the construction operations within its scope.…
|
3 |
Recent cases
| Date | Case | Cited by |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Nov 2024 |
[2024] EWHC 2914 (TCC) · High Court: Technology and Construction Court
Part 36 is a self-contained procedural code. A compliant offer attracts its prescribed costs consequences unless it would be unjust to apply them. The…
|
|
| 10 Oct 2024 |
[2024] EWHC 2575 (TCC) · High Court: Technology and Construction Court
Without prejudice privilege is principally concerned with inter-party communications genuinely aimed at settling a dispute. It may extend to communications…
|
|
| 3 Oct 2024 |
[2024] EWHC 2516 (TCC) · High Court: Technology and Construction Court
A court should not reopen or correct matters determined in an earlier judgment where the time for raising the issue has passed and the court has no…
|
|
| 6 Sep 2024 |
[2024] EWHC 2295 (TCC) · High Court: Technology and Construction Court
An adjudicator’s allocation of liability for his own fees is ancillary to the adjudication and may be treated differently from the substantive decision. The…
|
|
| 18 Jun 2024 |
[2024] EWHC 1510 (TCC) · High Court: Technology and Construction Court
A contractual right to supplement a subcontractor’s labour arises only after compliance with the contract’s notice requirements. A party cannot rely on its own…
|
|
| 17 Oct 2023 |
[2023] EWHC 2576 (TCC) · High Court: Technology and Construction Court
Permission to appeal should not be granted merely because the result is unusual where the judge has applied established principles to exceptional facts. A…
|
|
| 6 Oct 2023 |
[2023] EWHC 2475 (TCC) · High Court: Technology and Construction Court
A stay of execution of a judgment enforcing an adjudicator’s decision is exceptional. The court must nevertheless exercise its discretion under CPR 83.7 where…
|
2 |
| 24 Aug 2023 |
[2023] EWHC 2152 (TCC) · High Court: Technology and Construction Court
A Part 8 claim is appropriate for a discrete question unlikely to involve a substantial dispute of fact, especially a contractual construction issue capable of…
|
5 |
| 16 Jun 2023 |
[2023] EWHC 1483 (TCC) · High Court: Technology and Construction Court
A stay of execution under CPR 83.7 requires the applicant to establish inability to pay or special circumstances. Where inability to pay is alleged, the…
|
|
| 15 Feb 2023 |
[2023] EWHC 301 (TCC) · High Court: Technology and Construction Court
Adjudication decisions are ordinarily enforced summarily as interim cash-flow measures. The court does not reconsider factual or legal errors, or the merits of…
|
|
| 30 Apr 2021 |
[2021] EWHC 1113 (TCC) · High Court: Technology and Construction Court
An adjudication decision remains binding and enforceable under the parties’ contractual scheme unless and until successfully challenged before the court or…
|
1 |
| 4 May 2020 |
[2020] EWHC 1305 (TCC) · High Court: Technology and Construction Court
Adjudication exists to secure interim cash flow. An adjudicator’s decision will ordinarily be enforced by summary judgment where the adjudicator had…
|
4 |
Based on judgments published by The National Archives (Find Case Law) in which Hawkswell Kilvington is named as solicitors, counted under the firm's current name. The figures are minimums: not every judgment names the solicitors, and a judgment is counted only when we are confident who acted. The selection of cases listed here is limited, and does not include family, criminal or anonymised cases. Firm details include data from the Solicitors Regulation Authority. zoomLaw is independent and not connected with Hawkswell Kilvington. Something wrong or missing? Tell us. All law firms.