Practice areas
Courts
Counsel most often instructed
Judgments by year
Cases later courts cite most
Cases KAREN TODNER LTD acted in that later judgments cite most often.
| Date | Case | Cited by |
|---|---|---|
| 20 Oct 2020 |
[2020] EWHC 2709 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
Under the Extradition Act 2003, an appeal is concerned with whether the extradition judge’s decision was wrong, not with a rehearing. For section 13(a), the…
|
4 |
Recent cases
| Date | Case | Cited by |
|---|---|---|
| 5 Mar 2026 |
[2026] EWHC 497 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
In an extradition arrest-warrant case, the presumption in favour of bail is displaced where there are substantial grounds for believing that the applicant…
|
|
| 29 Jul 2025 |
[2025] EWHC 1985 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
An extradition appeal is concerned with whether the district judge’s decision was wrong, not with rehearing the evidence. Appellate courts should respect…
|
|
| 29 Nov 2024 |
[2024] EWHC 3071 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
On a renewed application for permission to appeal in an extradition case, the appellate court must decide whether the district judge was wrong. It may conclude…
|
|
| 15 Nov 2024 |
[2024] EWHC 3020 (KB) · High Court: King's Bench Division
An injunction carrying penal consequences must be construed strictly and by its objective, ordinary meaning in the context known when it was made. A…
|
|
| 16 Sep 2021 |
[2021] UKUT 321 (IAC) · Upper Tribunal: Immigration and Asylum Chamber
When deciding the length of restricted leave for a person excluded from refugee protection but presently irremovable, the Secretary of State must assess the…
|
1 |
| 20 Oct 2020 |
[2020] EWHC 2709 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
Under the Extradition Act 2003, an appeal is concerned with whether the extradition judge’s decision was wrong, not with a rehearing. For section 13(a), the…
|
4 |
| 31 Oct 2019 |
[2019] EWHC 2898 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
On an application for permission to appeal in extradition proceedings, the proposed ground must be reasonably arguable. A decision-maker must engage with…
|
Based on judgments published by The National Archives (Find Case Law) in which KAREN TODNER LTD is named as solicitors, counted under the firm's current name. The figures are minimums: not every judgment names the solicitors, and a judgment is counted only when we are confident who acted. The selection of cases listed here is limited, and does not include family, criminal or anonymised cases. Firm details include data from the Solicitors Regulation Authority. zoomLaw is independent and not connected with KAREN TODNER LTD. Something wrong or missing? Tell us. All law firms.