Law firm

Kirkland & Ellis International LLP

Kirkland & Ellis International LLP is named as solicitors in at least 115 UK judgments from 2004 to 2026, most often in intellectual property and insolvency and restructuring. kirkland.com

115
judgments
74
in the last five years
3
in the Supreme Court or Privy Council
17
in the Court of Appeal

Practice areas

  • Intellectual property63
  • Insolvency and restructuring31
  • Commercial disputes25
  • Company and partnership21
  • Banking and finance3
  • Cross-border disputes3
  • Trusts, wills and private client2
  • Competition and regulated industries2

Courts

  • Supreme Court3
  • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)17
  • High Court95

Counsel most often instructed

  • James Segan16
  • Daniel Alexander12
  • Kathryn Pickard12
  • Ravi Mehta10
  • William Duncan10
  • David Allison9
  • Ryan Perkins9
  • Andrew Lykiardopoulos7

Judgments by year

  • 20268
  • 202511
  • 202421
  • 202325
  • 20229
  • 202110
  • 20208
  • 20191
  • 20184
  • 20171
  • 20162
  • 20152
  • 20143
  • 20130
  • 20121
  • 20112
  • 20102
  • 20093
  • 20081
  • 20070

Cases later courts cite most

Cases Kirkland & Ellis International LLP acted in that later judgments cite most often.

Date Case Cited by
2 Nov 2018
[2018] EWHC 2911 (Ch) · High Court: Chancery Division
At the convening stage of a scheme of arrangement, the court determines creditor classes and any clear jurisdictional obstacle. It does not decide the scheme’s…
52
6 May 2011
[2011] EWHC 1104 (Ch) · High Court: Chancery Division
For a solvent foreign company, the expression liable to be wound up in Companies Act 2006 scheme legislation identifies a category of company capable of…
27
19 Nov 2014
[2014] EWHC 3849 (Ch) · High Court: Chancery Division
For class composition in a creditors’ scheme, the court first compares creditors’ legal rights against the company. Differences in personal interests or…
19
19 Nov 2020
[2020] EWCA Civ 1562 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
In intellectual property litigation, restrictions on access to highly confidential material must give the receiving party the fullest appropriate disclosure…
18
22 Oct 2010
[2010] EWCA Civ 1248 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
A complex commercial agreement must be construed according to the meaning it would convey to a reasonable person, having regard to its language, context and…
14
12 Jul 2024
[2024] EWCA Civ 743 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
When a court determines the terms of a global FRAND licence, national limitation periods do not exclude earlier sales. A willing licensee would pay a fair…
11
14 Nov 2018
[2018] EWHC 3092 (Ch) · High Court: Chancery Division
The court may sanction a scheme of arrangement where the statutory requirements are satisfied, the classes were properly constituted and represented, the…
11
3 Oct 2024
[2024] EWCA Civ 1143 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
Where a standard-essential patent holder invokes the English court’s jurisdiction to determine global FRAND terms, and both parties undertake to enter the…
11
13 Nov 2024
[2024] UKSC 36 · Supreme Court
A trade mark application may be made in bad faith where its specification includes goods or services for which the applicant had no genuine intention to use…
11
26 Mar 2014
[2014] EWHC 997 (Ch) · High Court: Chancery Division
At the convening stage of a scheme of arrangement, the court makes only a preliminary assessment of class constitution and jurisdiction. Creditors belong in…
10

Recent cases

Date Case Cited by
14 Sep 2026
[2026] EWHC 2482 (Pat) · High Court: Patents Court
Parties must plead the material facts, but need not plead the law. A party may therefore advance a legal argument without specifically pleading it, provided…
28 Aug 2026
[2026] EWHC 2235 (Pat) · High Court: Patents Court
A patent claim for a wireless-communications system is not obvious merely because each step in a proposed development could be taken. The court must ask…
19 Jun 2026
[2026] EWHC 1498 (Comm) · High Court: Commercial Court
Abuse of process in phased litigation requires a broad, merits-based assessment of whether raising the point later misuses the court’s process. The fact that a…
1 May 2026
[2026] EWHC 999 (Pat) · High Court: Patents Court
In determining FRAND terms for a global SEP cross-licence, the court should begin with the most comparable licence available. A licence to the same portfolio…
25 Mar 2026
[2026] EWCA Civ 355 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
In a share sale agreement with a fixed completion date and place, delivery and payment are presumed to be concurrent conditions. The parties may agree…
20 Mar 2026
[2026] EWHC 665 (Comm) · High Court: Commercial Court
A claimant seeking remuneration for capital-introduction services must prove the existence and terms of any alleged contract, including the identity of the…
6 Mar 2026
[2026] EWHC 514 (Comm) · High Court: Commercial Court
In managing related proceedings, the court must balance the parties’ contingent interests in prompt and cost-efficient justice against the interests of other…
18 Dec 2025
[2025] EWHC 3331 (Pat) · High Court: Patents Court
An ITU-T patent licensing declaration creates an enforceable contract for the benefit of third parties. Its obligation is to make a RAND offer capable of…
1
21 Nov 2025
[2025] EWHC 3083 (Pat) · High Court: Patents Court
An anti-anti-suit injunction is an exceptional remedy. Its grant is never automatic and cannot follow merely because another case presents similar facts. Each…
1
5 Nov 2025
[2025] EWHC 2834 (Pat) · High Court: Patents Court
In an application for an interim injunction in pharmaceutical patent litigation, the court must apply the American Cyanamid principles to the evidence in the…
31 Oct 2025
[2025] EWCA Civ 1383 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
A standard-essential patent owner does not act in bad faith merely by using properly available infringement proceedings to press for determination of fair…
4
23 Jul 2025
[2025] EWCA Civ 936 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
In patent obviousness appeals, the Court of Appeal should intervene only for an error of law or principle in the trial judge’s multifactorial, fact-sensitive…

Based on judgments published by The National Archives (Find Case Law) in which Kirkland & Ellis International LLP is named as solicitors, counted under the firm's current name. The figures are minimums: not every judgment names the solicitors, and a judgment is counted only when we are confident who acted. The selection of cases listed here is limited, and does not include family, criminal or anonymised cases. Firm details include data from the Solicitors Regulation Authority. zoomLaw is independent and not connected with Kirkland & Ellis International LLP. Something wrong or missing? Tell us. All law firms.