Law firm

Lawrence & Co Solicitors LLP

Lawrence & Co Solicitors LLP is named as solicitors in at least 93 UK judgments from 2004 to 2025, most often in public and administrative law and extradition. lawsol.co.uk

93
judgments
16
in the last five years
6
in the Court of Appeal

Practice areas

  • Public and administrative law76
  • Extradition74
  • Civil liberties and human rights9
  • Crime7
  • Immigration and asylum6
  • Family and children5
  • Court of Protection and mental health1

Courts

  • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)6
  • High Court87

Counsel most often instructed

  • Mary Westcott12
  • Amelia Nice7
  • B Keith4
  • Ben Keith4
  • Ben Lloyd4
  • David Josse3
  • Natasha Draycott3

Judgments by year

  • 20260
  • 20251
  • 20241
  • 20234
  • 202210
  • 20211
  • 20204
  • 20193
  • 20184
  • 20176
  • 20162
  • 20156
  • 20148
  • 20137
  • 20127
  • 20114
  • 20107
  • 20091
  • 200812
  • 20072

Cases later courts cite most

Cases Lawrence & Co Solicitors LLP acted in that later judgments cite most often.

Date Case Cited by
12 Dec 2017
[2017] EWHC 3237 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
In an extradition appeal based on prison conditions, the strong presumption that an EU member state will comply with Convention obligations is rebuttable by…
11
9 Apr 2014
[2014] EWHC 1021 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
In extradition proceedings, a requested person alleging that prison conditions in another Convention state will breach Article 3 bears the legal burden of…
10
31 Jul 2017
[2017] EWHC 1981 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
In an extradition case involving prison conditions, the court must assess whether the individual faces a real risk of treatment contrary to Article 3 of the…
6
4 May 2022
[2022] EWHC 1024 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
In extradition cases, an operative presumption of ECHR compliance is displaced only by clear and cogent evidence of a real risk of a flagrant denial of Article…
4
24 Nov 2020
[2020] EWHC 3199 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
In extradition cases, mutual trust requires a presumption that the requesting state will comply with Article 3 ECHR and Article 4 of the Charter. That…
4
16 Jul 2018
[2018] EWHC 1885 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
In extradition cases involving a recognised systemic risk of treatment contrary to Article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights, a solemn individual…
4
14 Sep 2015
[2015] EWHC 2543 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
Under section 12A of the Extradition Act 2003, a requested person challenging extradition must first show reasonable grounds for believing that a decision to…
4
28 Jun 2006
[2006] EWHC 1623 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
Whether restrictions amount to a deprivation of liberty under Article 5 depends on the individual’s concrete situation. The court must assess the cumulative…
4
1 Jun 2022
[2022] EWHC 1351 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
In an extradition appeal based on Article 8 ECHR, proportionality must be assessed by a careful, fact-specific balance between the strong public interest in…
3
23 Sep 2008
[2008] EWHC 2448 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
The exclusion criteria for humanitarian protection in rule 339D of the Immigration Rules are disjunctive. They must be interpreted consistently with the…
3

Recent cases

Date Case Cited by
14 Nov 2025
[2025] EWHC 2999 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
Under section 25 of the Extradition Act 2003, the court must focus intensely on the requested person’s medical condition, its effect on daily life, and the…
23 Jan 2024
[2024] EWHC 43 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
In an extradition challenge based on Article 3, a requested person must show strong grounds for believing that surrender would expose them to a real risk of…
29 Jun 2023
[2023] EWHC 1587 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
Evidence of serious ill-treatment in a foreign prison does not by itself establish an arguable Article 3 bar to extradition. The presumption that a Council of…
1
28 Mar 2023
[2023] EWHC 700 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
Specific assurances from a requesting state will normally attract a presumption of compliance, even where the state has lost a general presumption concerning…
1
11 Nov 2022
[2022] EWHC 2877 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
In extradition proceedings, the public interest in extradition carries great weight, but its weight varies with the nature and seriousness of the offence. The…
19 Oct 2022
[2022] EWHC 2630 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
Fresh evidence in an extradition appeal must be assessed by asking whether it would have required the extradition judge to reach a different conclusion under…
29 Jul 2022
[2022] EWHC 2032 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
In extradition cases involving alleged deficiencies in judicial independence, systemic and general material remains relevant at the second stage of the…
1
1 Jun 2022
[2022] EWHC 1351 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
In an extradition appeal based on Article 8 ECHR, proportionality must be assessed by a careful, fact-specific balance between the strong public interest in…
3
27 May 2022
[2022] EWHC 1308 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
For section 10 of the Extradition Act 2003, the conduct described in an extradition request must be capable of amounting to an offence under UK law.…
4 May 2022
[2022] EWHC 1024 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
In extradition cases, an operative presumption of ECHR compliance is displaced only by clear and cogent evidence of a real risk of a flagrant denial of Article…
4
10 Feb 2022
[2022] EWHC 273 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
Where an order contains distinct parts adverse to each party, each party may independently appeal the part adverse to it. That is different from a contingent…
1
9 Feb 2022
[2022] EWHC 259 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
On a renewed application for permission to appeal in an extradition case, the court considered whether the Article 8 proportionality assessment was reasonably…

Based on judgments published by The National Archives (Find Case Law) in which Lawrence & Co Solicitors LLP is named as solicitors, counted under the firm's current name. The figures are minimums: not every judgment names the solicitors, and a judgment is counted only when we are confident who acted. The selection of cases listed here is limited, and does not include family, criminal or anonymised cases. Firm details include data from the Solicitors Regulation Authority. zoomLaw is independent and not connected with Lawrence & Co Solicitors LLP. Something wrong or missing? Tell us. All law firms.