Practice areas
Courts
Counsel most often instructed
Judgments by year
Cases later courts cite most
Cases Lloyds PR Solicitors acted in that later judgments cite most often.
| Date | Case | Cited by |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Jan 2015 |
[2015] EWHC 28 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
For the purposes of section 20 of the Extradition Act 2003, a criminal trial in a civil-law system may be a continuing process rather than a single hearing. A…
|
40 |
| 13 Mar 2015 |
[2015] EWHC 619 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
Section 12A of the Extradition Act 2003 creates a two-stage bar to extradition under an accusation European arrest warrant. The requested person must first…
|
22 |
| 15 Jul 2016 |
[2016] EWHC 1766 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
In extradition proceedings, a failure by the requesting authority to present evidence or comply with directions does not, without more, create a free-standing…
|
10 |
| 26 Feb 2021 |
[2021] EWHC 427 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
In extradition appeals involving prison conditions, past breaches of assurances do not create a general bar on return to Bulgaria. The court must assess the…
|
6 |
| 31 Oct 2018 |
[2018] EWHC 2848 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
Systemic or generalised deficiencies affecting judicial independence in an issuing Member State do not automatically require refusal to execute a European…
|
4 |
| 30 Jun 2022 |
[2022] EWHC 1775 (SCCO) · High Court: Senior Courts Costs Office
Under the Criminal Legal Aid (Remuneration) Regulations 2013, a cracked-trial fee is payable only where the statutory definition is satisfied. The provision…
|
4 |
| 24 Mar 2022 |
[2022] EWHC 665 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
For section 20 of the Extradition Act 2003, deliberate absence is not confined to proof that a person had actual knowledge that trial could proceed in his…
|
4 |
Recent cases
| Date | Case | Cited by |
|---|---|---|
| 10 May 2024 |
[2024] EWHC 1028 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
On an appeal under the Extradition Act 2003, the High Court asks whether the district judge’s decision was wrong, rather than conducting a rehearing or…
|
2 |
| 12 Apr 2024 |
[2024] EWHC 799 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
In an Article 8 extradition appeal, delay is not a freestanding factor. The court must examine its effect on the public interest in extradition and on the…
|
|
| 12 Dec 2023 |
[2023] EWHC 3089 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
In extradition proceedings, Article 8 requires a fact-sensitive balancing exercise. There is no separate exceptionality test, although the public interest in…
|
|
| 6 Oct 2023 |
[2023] EWHC 2378 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
For the purposes of the double-jeopardy bar in section 12 of the Extradition Act 2003, extradition may be barred where the requested prosecution is founded on…
|
1 |
| 29 Jul 2022 |
[2022] EWHC 2015 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
For the purposes of section 20 of the Extradition Act 2003, a person who was absent from trial may be treated as present where he knowingly instructed a lawyer…
|
|
| 30 Jun 2022 |
[2022] EWHC 1775 (SCCO) · High Court: Senior Courts Costs Office
Under the Criminal Legal Aid (Remuneration) Regulations 2013, a cracked-trial fee is payable only where the statutory definition is satisfied. The provision…
|
4 |
| 8 Jun 2022 |
[2022] EWHC 1401 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
For the purposes of Extradition Act 2003, a person convicted in absence may be treated as having deliberately absented himself where, knowing that criminal…
|
|
| 24 Mar 2022 |
[2022] EWHC 665 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
For section 20 of the Extradition Act 2003, deliberate absence is not confined to proof that a person had actual knowledge that trial could proceed in his…
|
4 |
| 26 Feb 2021 |
[2021] EWHC 427 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
In extradition appeals involving prison conditions, past breaches of assurances do not create a general bar on return to Bulgaria. The court must assess the…
|
6 |
| 9 Dec 2020 |
[2020] EWHC 3543 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
In a health-based extradition appeal, the court should assess the evidence through a structured three-stage approach: identify the individual’s medical…
|
1 |
| 28 Aug 2020 |
[2020] EWHC 3081 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
In extradition bail proceedings under section 22(1A) of the Criminal Justice Act 1967, the High Court assesses the risk of failure to surrender afresh. In a…
|
|
| 11 Mar 2019 |
[2019] EWHC 569 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
For the purposes of the Framework Decision and section 2(2) of the Extradition Act 2003, a public prosecutor is a judicial authority. The meaning of that…
|
Based on judgments published by The National Archives (Find Case Law) in which Lloyds PR Solicitors is named as solicitors, counted under the firm's current name. The figures are minimums: not every judgment names the solicitors, and a judgment is counted only when we are confident who acted. The selection of cases listed here is limited, and does not include family, criminal or anonymised cases. Firm details include data from the Solicitors Regulation Authority. zoomLaw is independent and not connected with Lloyds PR Solicitors. Something wrong or missing? Tell us. All law firms.