Practice areas
Courts
Judgments by year
Cases later courts cite most
Cases Pathfinder Legal Services acted in that later judgments cite most often.
| Date | Case | Cited by |
|---|---|---|
| 29 Jan 2019 |
[2019] EWHC 127 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
A previous planning appeal decision addressing the same issue is a material consideration. Consistency does not require identical outcomes, but an inspector…
|
3 |
| 14 Aug 2018 |
[2018] EWHC 2178 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
A local authority facing acute financial pressure must still make library-service decisions by reference to its statutory duties and all material…
|
3 |
Recent cases
| Date | Case | Cited by |
|---|---|---|
| 25 Feb 2026 |
[2026] EWHC 416 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
An admissions appeal panel must comply with the mandatory framework in the School Admissions Appeal Code. Its record and decision letter must enable the…
|
|
| 12 Jan 2026 |
[2026] EWHC 26 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
An experimental traffic order must identify a genuine experiment and explain its purpose. The statement of reasons must describe the nature of the experiment…
|
|
| 11 Jun 2025 |
[2025] EAT 83 · Employment Appeal Tribunal
A local authority may discharge its duty to meet an adult’s care and support needs by making direct payments under Care Act 2014. That statutory method does…
|
|
| 14 Apr 2025 |
[2025] EWHC 923 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
A substantive legitimate expectation requires a clear, unambiguous and sufficiently focused commitment. The assessment is context-sensitive. An alleged oral…
|
|
| 20 Nov 2024 |
[2024] EAT 180 · Employment Appeal Tribunal
An Employment Tribunal must give reasons which show that it has independently and even-handedly evaluated the parties’ material cases. Extensive unacknowledged…
|
1 |
| 7 May 2024 |
[2024] EWHC 1068 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
On an application for summary judgment concerning a statutory challenge to a traffic regulation order, the court must distinguish between a genuinely realistic…
|
|
| 23 Jun 2023 |
[2023] EWHC 1341 (Ch) · High Court: Chancery Division
The High Court’s power to intervene in a commons register is confined by the statutory scheme. It cannot correct or clarify an entry where the matter…
|
1 |
| 28 Mar 2023 |
[2023] UKUT 80 (AAC) · Upper Tribunal: Administrative Appeals Chamber
Information requested under the Freedom of Information Act 2000 may constitute the requester’s personal data even where it also concerns an issue, complaint or…
|
1 |
| 29 Jul 2019 |
[2019] EWHC 1967 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
Section 4A(5)(a) of the Fire and Rescue Services Act 2004 requires separate consideration of economy, efficiency and effectiveness. The expression is not a…
|
|
| 29 Jan 2019 |
[2019] EWHC 127 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
A previous planning appeal decision addressing the same issue is a material consideration. Consistency does not require identical outcomes, but an inspector…
|
3 |
| 14 Aug 2018 |
[2018] EWHC 2178 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
A local authority facing acute financial pressure must still make library-service decisions by reference to its statutory duties and all material…
|
3 |
| 12 Jul 2017 |
[2017] EWHC 1753 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
Regulation 5(4) permits a registration authority to give more than one reasonable opportunity to remedy a defective town or village green application. The…
|
Based on judgments published by The National Archives (Find Case Law) in which Pathfinder Legal Services is named as solicitors, counted under the firm's current name. The figures are minimums: not every judgment names the solicitors, and a judgment is counted only when we are confident who acted. The selection of cases listed here is limited, and does not include family, criminal or anonymised cases. Firm details include data from the Solicitors Regulation Authority. zoomLaw is independent and not connected with Pathfinder Legal Services. Something wrong or missing? Tell us. All law firms.