Practice areas
Courts
Counsel most often instructed
Judgments by year
Recent cases
| Date | Case | Cited by |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Sep 2026 |
[2026] EWHC 2233 (IPEC) · High Court: Intellectual Property Enterprise Court
A mark combining ordinary words is not descriptive merely because consumers can give it a natural literal meaning. Under Trade Marks Act 1994, the sign must be…
|
|
| 21 Jan 2026 |
[2026] EWHC 105 (Ch) · High Court: Chancery Division
At an interim injunction hearing, the court should not order disclosure merely because a party has referred to documents in submissions or an application…
|
|
| 15 Jan 2026 |
[2026] EWHC 237 (Ch) · High Court: Chancery Division
For short-term injunctive relief sought to preserve company assets pending an unfair prejudice petition, the court may apply the American Cyanamid approach…
|
|
| 5 Sep 2025 |
[2025] EWHC 2292 (Comm) · High Court: Commercial Court
For service under CPR Part 6.33(2B), the claimant must establish a good arguable case that the claim falls within the relevant gateway. The intended defendant…
|
|
| 31 Jul 2025 |
[2025] EWHC 2046 (Comm) · High Court: Commercial Court
When extending time for security for costs, the court must balance the applicant’s real difficulty in complying with the order against the need to protect the…
|
|
| 30 May 2025 |
[2025] EWCA Civ 681 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
For the bankruptcy jurisdictional test in section 265(2)(b)(i) of the Insolvency Act 1986, a debtor must have had a place of residence in England and Wales…
|
|
| 10 Dec 2024 |
[2024] EWHC 3459 (Ch) · High Court: Chancery Division
The decision whether witnesses may give evidence remotely is a case-management discretion. Permission should be granted only where there is good reason and a…
|
|
| 11 Apr 2024 |
[2024] EWHC 797 (Comm) · High Court: Commercial Court
Summary assessment of costs is a broad-brush exercise. The court should consider the parties’ competing submissions and the relevant features of the work, but…
|
|
| 13 Mar 2024 |
[2024] EWHC 371 (Comm) · High Court: Commercial Court
In construing a contractual time limit, the question is whether time was intended to be essential for the particular term, viewed in the contract’s full…
|
|
| 5 Jun 2023 |
[2023] EWHC 1340 (Ch) · High Court: Chancery Division
A carefully drafted shareholders’ agreement may reserve defined areas of company activity to shareholder approval, even though day-to-day management remains…
|
1 |
| 18 May 2023 |
[2023] EWHC 1144 (Ch) · High Court: Chancery Division
For service of a bankruptcy petition outside the jurisdiction, the creditor must show a good arguable case that a statutory jurisdictional gateway applies. A…
|
|
| 31 Jan 2023 |
[2023] EWHC 312 (Ch) · High Court: Chancery Division
For service of a bankruptcy petition out of the jurisdiction, the court applies Civil Procedure Rules 1998 Part 6 and the jurisdictional gateway in Insolvency…
|
1 |
Based on judgments published by The National Archives (Find Case Law) in which Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP is named as solicitors, counted under the firm's current name. The figures are minimums: not every judgment names the solicitors, and a judgment is counted only when we are confident who acted. The selection of cases listed here is limited, and does not include family, criminal or anonymised cases. Firm details include data from the Solicitors Regulation Authority. zoomLaw is independent and not connected with Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP. Something wrong or missing? Tell us. All law firms.