Practice areas
Courts
Counsel most often instructed
Judgments by year
Cases later courts cite most
Cases Preiskel & Co LLP acted in that later judgments cite most often.
| Date | Case | Cited by |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Jun 2018 |
[2018] UKSC 28 · Supreme Court
A legally innocent intermediary which is ordered to prevent third parties from using its facilities unlawfully is ordinarily entitled to an indemnity from the…
|
18 |
| 18 Nov 2022 |
[2022] EWHC 2938 (KB) · High Court: King's Bench Division
Under section 1(1) of Defamation Act 2013, a claimant must prove that each publication caused or is likely to cause serious reputational harm. The test…
|
12 |
| 23 Apr 2021 |
[2021] EWHC 952 (Comm) · High Court: Commercial Court
For a constituent territory of a federal state to claim immunity under section 14(2) of the State Immunity Act 1978, it must show that it acted in the exercise…
|
7 |
Recent cases
| Date | Case | Cited by |
|---|---|---|
| 5 Feb 2024 |
[2024] EWCA Civ 65 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
The duration of a freezing injunction is determined by its language, construed restrictively and in context. Where an English order under section 25 of the…
|
1 |
| 20 Dec 2023 |
[2023] EWHC 3124 (Ch) · High Court: Chancery Division
A director may borrow from a company without necessarily breaching fiduciary duty, but the transaction must be assessed against the company’s purpose…
|
1 |
| 6 Jun 2023 |
[2023] EWHC 1331 (Ch) · High Court: Chancery Division
An unless order making continuation of litigation conditional on payment of an earlier costs order is a discretionary sanction. The court must first determine…
|
1 |
| 10 May 2023 |
[2023] EWHC 1082 (Ch) · High Court: Chancery Division
A trustee’s retirement does not, without more, discharge an outstanding obligation to account. The court ordinarily enforces a trustee’s or personal…
|
|
| 18 Nov 2022 |
[2022] EWHC 2938 (KB) · High Court: King's Bench Division
Under section 1(1) of Defamation Act 2013, a claimant must prove that each publication caused or is likely to cause serious reputational harm. The test…
|
12 |
| 11 Nov 2022 |
[2022] EWHC 3110 (Comm) · High Court: Commercial Court
A freezing order must be construed sensibly in its procedural and substantive context. Where an order is granted in support of substantive proceedings in…
|
|
| 6 Apr 2022 |
[2022] EWHC 837 (QB) · High Court: Queen's Bench Division
In determining the natural and ordinary meaning of conversational social-media posts, the court applies an objective reasonable-reader test. The posts must be…
|
|
| 23 Apr 2021 |
[2021] EWHC 952 (Comm) · High Court: Commercial Court
For a constituent territory of a federal state to claim immunity under section 14(2) of the State Immunity Act 1978, it must show that it acted in the exercise…
|
7 |
| 4 Mar 2020 |
[2020] EWHC 890 (Comm) · High Court: Commercial Court
State-immunity issues should ordinarily be addressed at an early stage because the court must give effect to immunity even where the state does not appear.…
|
|
| 14 Jan 2020 |
[2020] EWHC 40 (Ch) · High Court: Chancery Division
Permission to serve proceedings out of the jurisdiction requires a serious issue to be tried, a good arguable case within a jurisdictional gateway, and England…
|
|
| 13 Jun 2018 |
[2018] UKSC 28 · Supreme Court
A legally innocent intermediary which is ordered to prevent third parties from using its facilities unlawfully is ordinarily entitled to an indemnity from the…
|
18 |
| 12 Feb 2016 |
[2016] EWHC 253 (Ch) · High Court: Chancery Division
Preferential promotion by a dominant undertaking of its own product in a related, non-dominated market may constitute an abuse if it has a reasonably likely…
|
1 |
Based on judgments published by The National Archives (Find Case Law) in which Preiskel & Co LLP is named as solicitors, counted under the firm's current name. The figures are minimums: not every judgment names the solicitors, and a judgment is counted only when we are confident who acted. The selection of cases listed here is limited, and does not include family, criminal or anonymised cases. Firm details include data from the Solicitors Regulation Authority. zoomLaw is independent and not connected with Preiskel & Co LLP. Something wrong or missing? Tell us. All law firms.