Practice areas
Courts
Counsel most often instructed
Judgments by year
Cases later courts cite most
Cases Rahman Lowe Solicitors acted in that later judgments cite most often.
| Date | Case | Cited by |
|---|---|---|
| 28 Oct 2016 |
[2016] EWHC 2688 (QB) · High Court: Queen's Bench Division
In a defamation claim, the meaning of words complained of is determined objectively by the single meaning conveyed to the ordinary reasonable viewer, taking…
|
5 |
Recent cases
| Date | Case | Cited by |
|---|---|---|
| 4 Aug 2026 |
[2026] EAT 84 · Employment Appeal Tribunal
A political, single-issue or research-informed belief may qualify as a philosophical belief if it meets the modest statutory threshold; those features alone do…
|
|
| 31 Mar 2026 |
[2026] EWCA Civ 400 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
In determining defamatory meaning, the court must identify the single natural and ordinary meaning conveyed to the hypothetical reasonable reader, reading the…
|
|
| 11 Jul 2025 |
[2025] EWHC 1782 (KB) · High Court: King's Bench Division
For the defence of honest opinion under Defamation Act 2013, the defendant must prove the facts relied on and show that an honest person could have held the…
|
1 |
| 28 Jun 2024 |
[2024] EWHC 1672 (KB) · High Court: King's Bench Division
In defamation proceedings, a trial of preliminary issues on serious harm should ordinarily be left to the trial of liability. The court should be slow to order…
|
|
| 14 Mar 2024 |
[2024] EAT 35 · Employment Appeal Tribunal
Section 44(1)(c) of the Employment Rights Act 1996 protects an employee who raises, by reasonable means, health and safety concerns connected with work. Those…
|
|
| 24 Nov 2023 |
[2023] EAT 142 · Employment Appeal Tribunal
A dismissal following withdrawal under rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013 bars only a further claim…
|
1 |
| 17 Nov 2023 |
[2023] EWHC 2847 (KB) · High Court: King's Bench Division
In determining meaning in defamation proceedings, the court must adopt the natural and ordinary meaning conveyed to the hypothetical reasonable reader. The…
|
2 |
| 3 Mar 2023 |
[2023] EWHC 482 (KB) · High Court: King's Bench Division
In determining the meaning of a social-media publication, the court must identify the single natural and ordinary meaning conveyed to the hypothetical…
|
|
| 28 Oct 2016 |
[2016] EWHC 2688 (QB) · High Court: Queen's Bench Division
In a defamation claim, the meaning of words complained of is determined objectively by the single meaning conveyed to the ordinary reasonable viewer, taking…
|
5 |
Based on judgments published by The National Archives (Find Case Law) in which Rahman Lowe Solicitors is named as solicitors, counted under the firm's current name. The figures are minimums: not every judgment names the solicitors, and a judgment is counted only when we are confident who acted. The selection of cases listed here is limited, and does not include family, criminal or anonymised cases. Firm details include data from the Solicitors Regulation Authority. zoomLaw is independent and not connected with Rahman Lowe Solicitors. Something wrong or missing? Tell us. All law firms.