Practice areas
Courts
Counsel most often instructed
Judgments by year
Recent cases
| Date | Case | Cited by |
|---|---|---|
| 2 Jun 2026 |
[2026] EWCA Civ 687 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
A general or “target” statutory duty is not automatically a mandatory relevant consideration for every public-law decision. It becomes one only where the…
|
1 |
| 15 Apr 2026 |
[2026] EWHC 886 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
A consultation on changes to children’s centre provision is lawful where it occurs while proposals remain open to development, even though budgetary…
|
|
| 26 Jan 2026 |
[2026] UKUT 31 (AAC) · Upper Tribunal: Administrative Appeals Chamber
Special educational provision must have a sufficient nexus with the child or young person’s special educational needs. The needs identified in Section B of an…
|
|
| 1 Dec 2025 |
[2025] EWCA Civ 1556 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
In public law, a matter is a mandatory relevant consideration only if it is so obviously material that it would be irrational for the decision-maker to omit…
|
|
| 31 Jul 2025 |
[2025] EWHC 2015 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
Judicial review of an expert healthcare regulator requires scrutiny calibrated to the importance of the interests affected, but the court must still respect…
|
1 |
| 5 Jun 2024 |
[2024] EWHC 1305 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
A public authority deciding how to allocate finite funds in an economic and social policy scheme may use a reasonable proxy for identifying those in need. The…
|
1 |
| 31 Jul 2023 |
[2023] EWCA Civ 902 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
A duty requiring NHS England to make arrangements to ensure that at least 92% of relevant patients wait less than 18 weeks is a target duty. It requires…
|
1 |
| 16 Nov 2022 |
[2022] UKUT 305 (AAC) · Upper Tribunal: Administrative Appeals Chamber
A local authority cannot specify special educational provision in an education, health and care plan on the basis that it will be delivered by a young person’s…
|
Based on judgments published by The National Archives (Find Case Law) in which Rook Irwin Sweeney LLP is named as solicitors, counted under the firm's current name. The figures are minimums: not every judgment names the solicitors, and a judgment is counted only when we are confident who acted. The selection of cases listed here is limited, and does not include family, criminal or anonymised cases. Firm details include data from the Solicitors Regulation Authority. zoomLaw is independent and not connected with Rook Irwin Sweeney LLP. Something wrong or missing? Tell us. All law firms.