Practice areas
Courts
Judgments by year
Cases later courts cite most
Cases Shaw Graham Kersh acted in that later judgments cite most often.
| Date | Case | Cited by |
|---|---|---|
| 20 Jun 2017 |
[2017] EWHC 1427 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
For extradition to a state whose prison assurances provide less than 3m² of personal space, the Article 3 assessment must apply the cumulative approach in…
|
14 |
| 14 May 2015 |
[2015] EWHC 2522 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
In an extradition appeal, delay caused by a requested person’s deliberate evasion cannot ordinarily support an oppression challenge under section 14. A person…
|
4 |
| 26 Feb 2009 |
[2009] EWHC 279 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
Technical non-compliance with mechanical requirements under Part I of the Extradition Act 2003 does not automatically require discharge or dismissal. Where…
|
4 |
| 7 Feb 2012 |
[2012] EWHC 173 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
Under Extradition Act 2003, a European arrest warrant must accurately state the sentence imposed at the time the requested person is to be extradited. Where…
|
3 |
Recent cases
| Date | Case | Cited by |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Jul 2026 |
[2026] EWHC 1804 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
In extradition proceedings under the Extradition Act 2003, systemic or generalised deficiencies in the requesting state’s judiciary satisfy only the first…
|
|
| 14 Dec 2018 |
[2018] EWHC 3467 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
Under section 14 of the Extradition Act 2003, passage of time bars extradition only where it makes extradition unjust or oppressive. The question focuses on…
|
|
| 20 Jun 2017 |
[2017] EWHC 1427 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
For extradition to a state whose prison assurances provide less than 3m² of personal space, the Article 3 assessment must apply the cumulative approach in…
|
14 |
| 7 Feb 2017 |
[2017] EWHC 852 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
On an appeal concerning extradition and Article 8 proportionality, errors in the lower court’s assessment of relevant factors do not automatically require the…
|
|
| 13 May 2016 |
[2016] EWHC 1745 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
At the permission stage of an extradition challenge, an applicant must show an arguable case that extradition would breach article 3 or article 8. Evidence of…
|
|
| 22 Mar 2016 |
[2016] EWHC 753 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
In an extradition case engaging Article 8, the court must balance the interference with private and family life against the public interest in extradition.…
|
|
| 14 May 2015 |
[2015] EWHC 2522 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
In an extradition appeal, delay caused by a requested person’s deliberate evasion cannot ordinarily support an oppression challenge under section 14. A person…
|
4 |
| 27 Oct 2014 |
[2014] EWHC 3892 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
In an extradition case engaging article 8, the requested person must establish a particularly strong case before the balancing exercise will outweigh the…
|
|
| 8 Oct 2014 |
[2014] EWHC 4417 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
In extradition proceedings, an Article 3 objection succeeds only where substantial grounds establish a real risk of torture or inhuman or degrading treatment…
|
2 |
| 2 Sep 2014 |
[2014] EWHC 3198 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
In an extradition appeal raising Article 8, the court must balance the serious hardship to the requested person and blameless family members against the public…
|
|
| 10 May 2013 |
[2013] EWHC 1428 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
For the purposes of Dentists Act 1984, the question whether treatment constitutes the practice of dentistry is whether it is usually performed by dentists.…
|
|
| 7 Feb 2012 |
[2012] EWHC 173 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
Under Extradition Act 2003, a European arrest warrant must accurately state the sentence imposed at the time the requested person is to be extradited. Where…
|
3 |
Based on judgments published by The National Archives (Find Case Law) in which Shaw Graham Kersh is named as solicitors, counted under the firm's current name. The figures are minimums: not every judgment names the solicitors, and a judgment is counted only when we are confident who acted. The selection of cases listed here is limited, and does not include family, criminal or anonymised cases. Firm details include data from the Solicitors Regulation Authority. zoomLaw is independent and not connected with Shaw Graham Kersh. Something wrong or missing? Tell us. All law firms.