Practice areas
Courts
Counsel most often instructed
Judgments by year
Cases later courts cite most
Cases Tuckers Solicitors acted in that later judgments cite most often.
| Date | Case | Cited by |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Feb 2008 |
[2008] EWCA Civ 72 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
A non-statutory compensation policy is construed objectively and purposively by the court. It should not be read with technical distinctions that defeat its…
|
43 |
| 4 Feb 2010 |
[2010] UKSC 5 · Supreme Court
A court may suspend the operation of an order which it makes. That power does not, however, permit an unlawful legislative measure to acquire temporary…
|
25 |
| 29 Jul 2019 |
[2019] EWHC 2062 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
A requested person is a fugitive for the purposes of Extradition Act 2003, section 14 only if, to the criminal standard, they deliberately and knowingly placed…
|
25 |
| 13 Mar 2015 |
[2015] EWHC 619 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
Section 12A of the Extradition Act 2003 creates a two-stage bar to extradition under an accusation European arrest warrant. The requested person must first…
|
22 |
| 30 Nov 2011 |
[2011] EWCA Civ 1422 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
In a review of Category A security status, an oral hearing is required only where common-law procedural fairness demands it. The assessment is fact-sensitive.…
|
17 |
| 2 Nov 2005 |
[2005] EWHC 2405 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
Section 34 of the Extradition Act 2003 does not remove the common-law remedy of habeas corpus for unlawful detention under Part I. Stronger words would be…
|
11 |
| 15 Dec 2009 |
[2009] EWHC 3528 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
For the purposes of the statutory bar based on delay, responsibility cannot be attributed to an accused merely because he remained abroad after being released…
|
11 |
| 11 Nov 2009 |
[2009] EWHC 2927 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
Article 6 applies to control-order proceedings where the order directly restricts an individual’s rights and freedoms. The fact that the obligations are…
|
7 |
| 30 Jun 2015 |
[2015] EWCA Civ 646 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
Article 3 of the Human Rights Act 1998 imposes an investigative duty which is inherent in the Article itself and does not depend on Article 1 or State…
|
6 |
| 6 Nov 2019 |
[2019] EWHC 2978 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
The forum bar under the Extradition Act 2003, section 83A, requires a narrowly confined statutory interests-of-justice assessment. After deciding that a…
|
6 |
Recent cases
| Date | Case | Cited by |
|---|---|---|
| 20 Feb 2026 |
[2026] EWHC 394 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
The slip rule permits correction of an accidental failure to express the court’s intention at the time of promulgation. It does not permit the court or…
|
|
| 19 Dec 2025 |
[2025] EWCA Civ 1671 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
The duty to refuse relief under the Senior Courts Act 1981, section 31(2A)(a), is displaced only through the two-stage mechanism in section 31(2B). The court…
|
|
| 26 Nov 2025 |
[2025] EWHC 3444 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
A pre-tariff sift for referral to the Parole Board is lawful where it prioritises cases in which there is a provisional basis for concluding that the criteria…
|
|
| 17 Dec 2024 |
[2024] EWHC 3252 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
A designation under section 1 of the Dangerous Dogs Act 1991 involves an evaluative judgment for the Secretary of State. Judicial review is concerned with…
|
|
| 3 Oct 2023 |
[2023] EWHC 2561 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
Where fresh evidence indicates that time spent on electronically monitored bail may have been equivalent to a period of detention deductible from a foreign…
|
|
| 11 Jul 2023 |
[2023] EWHC 1740 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
In a Part 2 extradition case, certification by the Secretary of State does not prevent the District Judge from deciding whether the requested person is an…
|
1 |
| 5 May 2023 |
[2023] EWHC 997 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
In an extradition appeal raising prison conditions, the court may receive a fresh assurance from the requesting state whenever offered. The governing question…
|
1 |
| 23 Jun 2022 |
[2022] EWHC 1608 (QB) · High Court: Queen's Bench Division
Article 2 operational duties remain an evolving area. A claim should not be struck out where the pleaded facts arguably establish that a public authority…
|
|
| 2 Mar 2022 |
[2022] EWHC 447 (QB) · High Court: Queen's Bench Division
The court has a discretion as to whether costs are payable, their amount and when they are to be paid. The general rule is that the unsuccessful party pays the…
|
|
| 12 Jan 2022 |
[2022] EWHC 35 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
On a forum-bar appeal, the court must first decide whether a substantial measure of the requested person’s relevant activity was performed in the United…
|
2 |
| 9 Nov 2021 |
[2021] EWHC 3358 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
Forfeiture proceedings under section 298 of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 may be advanced on both statutory bases: recoverable property and cash intended for…
|
|
| 20 Jul 2021 |
[2021] EWHC 2036 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
In an extradition appeal under article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights, the court must conduct the familiar proportionality balance between the…
|
1 |
Earlier names
These figures include judgments naming firms that have since merged into, or been renamed as, Tuckers Solicitors: Murray Brankin Solicitors.
Based on judgments published by The National Archives (Find Case Law) in which Tuckers Solicitors is named as solicitors, counted under the firm's current name. The figures are minimums: not every judgment names the solicitors, and a judgment is counted only when we are confident who acted. The selection of cases listed here is limited, and does not include family, criminal or anonymised cases. Firm details include data from the Solicitors Regulation Authority. zoomLaw is independent and not connected with Tuckers Solicitors. Something wrong or missing? Tell us. All law firms.