Law firm

Whitehead Monckton

Whitehead Monckton is named as solicitors in at least 6 UK judgments from 2004 to 2023, most often in commercial disputes and real estate.

6
judgments
1
in the last five years
2
in the Court of Appeal

Practice areas

  • Commercial disputes2
  • Real estate2
  • Personal injury1
  • Insolvency and restructuring1
  • Planning and environment1
  • Public and administrative law1

Courts

  • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)2
  • High Court3
  • Upper Tribunal1

Judgments by year

  • 20260
  • 20250
  • 20240
  • 20231
  • 20220
  • 20210
  • 20200
  • 20192
  • 20181
  • 20170
  • 20160
  • 20151
  • 20140
  • 20130
  • 20120
  • 20110
  • 20100
  • 20090
  • 20080
  • 20070

Cases later courts cite most

Cases Whitehead Monckton acted in that later judgments cite most often.

Date Case Cited by
30 Apr 2004
Popely v Popely
[2004] EWCA Civ 463 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
A claim by a debtor against the creditor is a “cross demand” under rule 6.5(4)(a) of the Insolvency Rules 1986. Its status does not depend on the nature of the…
 10

Recent cases

Date Case Cited by
29 Aug 2023
Andrew Riddell Dunlop v Rostislav Rostislavavitch Romanoff
[2023] UKUT 200 (LC) · Upper Tribunal: Lands Chamber
Where a conveyance states that land is more particularly delineated on a plan, a clear plan will normally prevail over an unclear verbal description. That is…
 1
9 May 2019
Persimmon Homes Ltd v Hillier & Anor
[2019] EWCA Civ 800 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
Rectification may be granted where the parties’ communications, viewed objectively and as a whole, establish a continuing common intention which the executed…
 2
6 Nov 2018
Baillie v Savage
[2018] EWHC 3035 (Ch) · High Court: Chancery Division
A rent suspension clause requiring destruction or damage during the tenancy may be engaged where that initial damage creates a real risk of further damage…
30 Apr 2004
Popely v Popely
[2004] EWCA Civ 463 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
A claim by a debtor against the creditor is a “cross demand” under rule 6.5(4)(a) of the Insolvency Rules 1986. Its status does not depend on the nature of the…
 10

Based on judgments published by The National Archives (Find Case Law) in which Whitehead Monckton is named as solicitors, counted under the firm's current name. The figures are minimums: not every judgment names the solicitors, and a judgment is counted only when we are confident who acted. The selection of cases listed here is limited, and does not include family, criminal or anonymised cases. Firm details include data from the Solicitors Regulation Authority. zoomLaw is independent and not connected with Whitehead Monckton. Something wrong or missing? Tell us. All law firms.