(1) A worker has the right to be given by his employer, at or before the time at which any payment of wages or salary is made to him, a written itemised pay statement.
(2)The statement shall contain particulars of—
(a)the gross amount of the wages or salary,
(b)the amounts of any variable, and (subject to section 9) any fixed, deductions from that gross amount and the purposes for which they are made,
(c)the net amount of wages or salary payable, ...
(d)where different parts of the net amount are paid in different ways, the amount and method of payment of each part-payment; and
(e)where the amount of wages or salary varies by reference to time worked, the total number of hours worked in respect of the variable amount of wages or salary either as—
(i)a single aggregate figure, or
(ii)separate figures for different types of work or different rates of pay.
Cases considering section 8 5
[2026] EAT 87 · 14 May 2026Interprets
Interprets the requirement that a worker be given a written itemised pay statement purposively. Physical delivery is unnecessary if the employer provides accessible information enabling the worker to understand and challenge pay and deductions; practical barriers or material costs may prevent compliance (see paras [26]-[32]).
Applies the obligation to provide a written itemised pay statement at or before payment of wages. The respondent complied because its electronic system made the relevant information continuously accessible and the claimant had the means to access it (see paras [8], [27]-[35]).
[2014] UKEAT 0098_10_2309 · 23 September 2014Interprets
Section 8 requires an itemised statement to show gross and net pay and to identify the amount and purpose of deductions. A recovery of an earlier overpayment is such a deduction, unlike a current-period calculation of pay reduced for unpaid absence (see paras [20]-[25]).
[2018] EWCA Civ 2861 · 20 December 2018Defines
The Court treated “pay statement” as the statutory name for the document generally called a payslip. The official form’s use of that term therefore did not establish that it sought a different document (see para [25]).
1 more judgment, and what each says about section 8, are in the
case-law panel in the full Act.