Law firm

Brewer, Harding & Rowe

Brewer, Harding & Rowe is named as solicitors in at least 6 UK judgments from 2007 to 2023, most often in trusts, wills and private client and real estate.

6
judgments
1
in the last five years
3
in the Court of Appeal

Practice areas

  • Trusts, wills and private client3
  • Real estate2
  • Family and children1
  • Housing1
  • Personal injury1

Courts

  • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)3
  • High Court3

Judgments by year

  • 20260
  • 20250
  • 20240
  • 20231
  • 20220
  • 20210
  • 20200
  • 20191
  • 20181
  • 20170
  • 20160
  • 20150
  • 20140
  • 20131
  • 20120
  • 20110
  • 20100
  • 20090
  • 20081
  • 20071

Cases later courts cite most

Cases Brewer, Harding & Rowe acted in that later judgments cite most often.

Date Case Cited by
23 Feb 2007
[2007] EWCA Civ 225 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
An appellate court may interfere with an award of general damages only where the judge applied a wrong legal principle, misapprehended the facts or made a…
5

Recent cases

Date Case Cited by
5 Dec 2023
[2023] EWHC 3043 (Ch) · High Court: Chancery Division
A court order must be construed by identifying its natural and ordinary meaning in context, including the history and purpose of the order and the reasons for…
15 May 2019
[2019] EWHC 1231 (Ch) · High Court: Chancery Division
A litigation costs order does not automatically determine an executor’s separate right to indemnity from the estate. The two questions involve different…
2
8 Mar 2018
[2018] EWHC 430 (Ch) · High Court: Chancery Division
On taking an account between executors and beneficiaries, the executor need initially establish only that the sum was spent and that it was spent in the fair…
22 Jul 2008
[2008] EWCA Civ 840 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
Under section 7(4) of the Housing Act 1988, proving a possession ground does not itself require an order: reasonableness remains a fact-sensitive evaluation.…
1
23 Feb 2007
[2007] EWCA Civ 225 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
An appellate court may interfere with an award of general damages only where the judge applied a wrong legal principle, misapprehended the facts or made a…
5

Based on judgments published by The National Archives (Find Case Law) in which Brewer, Harding & Rowe is named as solicitors, counted under the firm's current name. The figures are minimums: not every judgment names the solicitors, and a judgment is counted only when we are confident who acted. The selection of cases listed here is limited, and does not include family, criminal or anonymised cases. Firm details include data from the Solicitors Regulation Authority. zoomLaw is independent and not connected with Brewer, Harding & Rowe. Something wrong or missing? Tell us. All law firms.