Practice areas
Courts
Counsel most often instructed
Judgments by year
Cases later courts cite most
Cases Cartwright King acted in that later judgments cite most often.
| Date | Case | Cited by |
|---|---|---|
| 4 Jun 2020 |
[2020] EWHC 1400 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
A police misconduct panel must apply the prescribed three-stage approach when determining sanction. It must assess seriousness, recall the purposes of…
|
10 |
| 19 Nov 2009 |
[2009] UKSC 4 · Supreme Court
A European arrest warrant must identify the domestic judgment, arrest warrant or other enforceable judicial decision on which it is based. The requirement in…
|
10 |
| 21 Oct 2014 |
[2014] EWCA Civ 1367 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
In a special requirements investigation, an IPCC report must state the investigator’s opinion whether there is a case to answer before a criminal court or…
|
6 |
| 24 Jul 2009 |
[2009] EWCA Civ 795 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
The majority held that a detained patient has no Article 8 right to smoke in a secure psychiatric hospital. Whether an activity falls within private life…
|
4 |
| 16 Jul 2010 |
[2010] EWHC 1780 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
Article 5(4) and procedural fairness do not require an oral hearing in every case concerning a prisoner’s release or continued detention. The question is…
|
3 |
Recent cases
| Date | Case | Cited by |
|---|---|---|
| 2 Dec 2022 |
[2022] EWHC 3076 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
A misconduct panel’s classification of conduct under several professional standards does not, without more, increase its substantive gravity. Judicial review…
|
|
| 4 Jun 2020 |
[2020] EWHC 1400 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
A police misconduct panel must apply the prescribed three-stage approach when determining sanction. It must assess seriousness, recall the purposes of…
|
10 |
| 2 Oct 2018 |
[2018] EWCA Civ 2107 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
Paragraphs 7(1) and 7(2) of Schedule 3 to the Police (Injury Benefit) Regulations 2006 must be read together. The provisions governing benefit scales include…
|
|
| 23 Aug 2018 |
[2018] EWHC 2250 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
A public authority’s decision on remuneration for publicly funded criminal defence advocates may be amenable to judicial review where it is a necessary core…
|
1 |
| 20 Jul 2018 |
[2018] EWHC 1852 (QB) · High Court: Queen's Bench Division
Indemnity costs require conduct or circumstances taking the case out of the norm. The court retains a broad discretion, and mere error, hindsight or failure on…
|
|
| 6 Dec 2017 |
[2017] EWHC 3120 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
A court considering late enforcement of a confiscation order by imprisonment should determine the application on its merits. The central question is whether…
|
1 |
| 16 Nov 2017 |
[2017] EWHC 2835 (QB) · High Court: Queen's Bench Division
Paragraph 7(2) of Schedule 3 to the Police (Injury Benefit) Pensions Regulations 2006 refers to the statutory provisions governing the uprating of social…
|
|
| 16 Dec 2015 |
[2015] EWHC 3665 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
Liability to forfeiture under section 170B(2) of the Customs and Excise Management Act 1979 does not require a prior criminal conviction under section 170B(1).…
|
|
| 21 Oct 2014 |
[2014] EWCA Civ 1367 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
In a special requirements investigation, an IPCC report must state the investigator’s opinion whether there is a case to answer before a criminal court or…
|
6 |
| 12 Aug 2014 |
[2014] UKUT 376 (IAC) · Upper Tribunal: Immigration and Asylum Chamber
For a foreign criminal sentenced to at least four years’ imprisonment, paragraph 398(a) of the Immigration Rules prevents reliance on paragraphs 399 and 399A.…
|
|
| 16 Jul 2010 |
[2010] EWHC 1780 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
Article 5(4) and procedural fairness do not require an oral hearing in every case concerning a prisoner’s release or continued detention. The question is…
|
3 |
| 19 Nov 2009 |
[2009] UKSC 4 · Supreme Court
A European arrest warrant must identify the domestic judgment, arrest warrant or other enforceable judicial decision on which it is based. The requirement in…
|
10 |
Earlier names
These figures include judgments naming firms that have since merged into, or been renamed as, Cartwright King: Garstangs Burrows Bussin LLP, MacNab Clarke, Solicitors, The First Law Partnership Ltd, Garstangs Cartwright King.
Based on judgments published by The National Archives (Find Case Law) in which Cartwright King is named as solicitors, counted under the firm's current name. The figures are minimums: not every judgment names the solicitors, and a judgment is counted only when we are confident who acted. The selection of cases listed here is limited, and does not include family, criminal or anonymised cases. Firm details include data from the Solicitors Regulation Authority. zoomLaw is independent and not connected with Cartwright King. Something wrong or missing? Tell us. All law firms.