Law firm

Corker Binning

Corker Binning is named as solicitors in at least 21 UK judgments from 2003 to 2025, most often in public and administrative law and crime.

21
judgments
3
in the last five years
9
in the Court of Appeal

Practice areas

  • Public and administrative law11
  • Crime10
  • Extradition7
  • Immigration and asylum2
  • Civil fraud and asset recovery1
  • Public international law and sanctions1
  • Civil liberties and human rights1
  • Financial crime and investigations1

Courts

  • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)1
  • Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)8
  • High Court12

Judgments by year

  • 20260
  • 20251
  • 20240
  • 20231
  • 20221
  • 20211
  • 20201
  • 20192
  • 20180
  • 20171
  • 20160
  • 20151
  • 20141
  • 20133
  • 20121
  • 20111
  • 20101
  • 20091
  • 20081
  • 20070

Cases later courts cite most

Cases Corker Binning acted in that later judgments cite most often.

Date Case Cited by
19 Mar 2010
[2010] EWHC 567 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
In extradition proceedings, the court must decide Convention issues for itself. It does not review the Secretary of State’s assessment of Articles 3, 5, 6 or 8…
3

Recent cases

Date Case Cited by
24 Nov 2025
[2025] EWHC 3086 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
Where an extradition order is quashed on appeal, the High Court may infer a supervisory power to quash a consequential costs order made on the basis of that…
8 Jun 2023
[2023] EWHC 1777 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
Interim relief in a public law claim is governed by the modified American Cyanamid approach. The court asks whether there is a serious issue to be tried…
22 Jul 2022
[2022] EWHC 1914 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
An appellate court reviewing an extradition judge’s Article 8 proportionality assessment must review the decision rather than conduct the balancing exercise…
10 Jul 2020
[2020] EWHC 1797 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
Overcrowding measured against an institution’s official capacity does not, by itself, establish a real risk of treatment contrary to article 3. The requested…
1
12 Apr 2017
[2017] EWHC 832 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
In an extradition appeal based on Article 8 ECHR, proportionality is assessed by balancing the seriousness and likely impact of extradition against the public…
20 Dec 2013
[2013] EWHC 4015 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
In cash-forfeiture proceedings, the authority must identify the kind or kinds of unlawful conduct said to have generated the cash. A court should apply the…
4 Jul 2013
[2013] EWHC 1906 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
Under section 91 of the Extradition Act 2003, the question is whether extradition would be unjust or oppressive in all the relevant circumstances. A genuine…
1
28 Nov 2012
[2012] EWCA Civ 1830 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
A final appellate determination may be reopened only where reopening is necessary to avoid real injustice, exceptional circumstances make it appropriate, and…
19 Mar 2010
[2010] EWHC 567 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
In extradition proceedings, the court must decide Convention issues for itself. It does not review the Secretary of State’s assessment of Articles 3, 5, 6 or 8…
3
25 Nov 2005
[2005] EWHC 2704 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
A constituent state of a federation may, in principle, qualify for state immunity even if it lacks power to conduct international relations. Whether it does so…
1

Based on judgments published by The National Archives (Find Case Law) in which Corker Binning is named as solicitors, counted under the firm's current name. The figures are minimums: not every judgment names the solicitors, and a judgment is counted only when we are confident who acted. The selection of cases listed here is limited, and does not include family, criminal or anonymised cases. Firm details include data from the Solicitors Regulation Authority. zoomLaw is independent and not connected with Corker Binning. Something wrong or missing? Tell us. All law firms.