Law firm

Harbottle & Lewis LLP

Harbottle & Lewis LLP is named as solicitors in at least 70 UK judgments from 2003 to 2026, most often in commercial disputes and intellectual property.

70
judgments
10
in the last five years
1
in the Supreme Court or Privy Council
11
in the Court of Appeal

Practice areas

  • Commercial disputes19
  • Intellectual property12
  • Family and children9
  • Media, defamation and privacy8
  • Public and administrative law6
  • Cross-border disputes6
  • Insolvency and restructuring4
  • Employment3

Courts

  • Supreme Court1
  • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)11
  • High Court57
  • Employment Appeal Tribunal1

Counsel most often instructed

  • Hugh Tomlinson5
  • James Aldridge4
  • Daniel Bentham3
  • David Sherborne3
  • Richard Morgan3

Judgments by year

  • 20261
  • 20251
  • 20244
  • 20231
  • 20223
  • 20215
  • 20203
  • 20196
  • 20182
  • 20171
  • 20160
  • 20152
  • 20142
  • 20136
  • 20121
  • 20114
  • 20106
  • 20093
  • 20083
  • 20072

Cases later courts cite most

Cases Harbottle & Lewis LLP acted in that later judgments cite most often.

Date Case Cited by
18 Jan 2019
[2019] EWHC 48 (QB) · High Court: Queen's Bench Division
The natural and ordinary meaning of an allegedly defamatory book is the broad impression conveyed to the hypothetical reasonable reader by the whole…
163
21 Dec 2006
[2006] EWCA Civ 1776 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
Where private information has been obtained through a known breach of confidence, the proportionality exercise between privacy and freedom of expression must…
32
27 Jul 2011
[2011] UKSC 39 · Supreme Court
“Sculpture” bears its ordinary meaning under the Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988. Artistic quality is irrelevant, but the object must possess an…
24
20 Mar 2003
[2003] EWCA Civ 323 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
A claimant’s inability to prove financial loss does not necessarily confine contractual damages to a nominal sum. Where a defendant has deliberately obtained a…
21
25 Jul 2003
[2003] EWCA Civ 1058 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
A signed document can create an immediate binding contract when, construed purposively against its factual background, it manifests an intention to be…
17
16 Dec 2009
[2009] EWCA Civ 1328 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
For copyright purposes, sculpture is an artistic category under the Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988. It requires some element of artistic expression or…
16
6 Nov 2009
[2009] EWHC 2783 (Ch) · High Court: Chancery Division
An exclusive jurisdiction clause is construed broadly in accordance with the parties’ commercial purpose. Claims fall within the clause where determination of…
13
26 Jun 2003
[2003] EWHC 1423 (Ch) · High Court: Chancery Division
A contractual novation may be inferred where it is necessary to give business efficacy and a lawful explanation to the parties’ conduct. The parties need not…
12
1 Nov 2005
[2005] EWHC 2351 (Ch) · High Court: Chancery Division
When deciding whether England is the appropriate forum for service out of the jurisdiction, the court must identify the likely issues and compare the competing…
7
27 Nov 2013
[2013] EWHC 3724 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
In a public interest immunity claim involving national security, the court must ultimately balance disclosure against non-disclosure. The minister’s assessment…
5

Recent cases

Date Case Cited by
15 Jul 2026
[2026] EWHC 1799 (KB) · High Court: King's Bench Division
Where a pleading defect is accepted but may be corrected, the court may strike out the defective pleading while preserving an opportunity to file a replacement…
24 Oct 2024
[2024] EWHC 3622 (Ch) · High Court: Chancery Division
For CPR 18.1, a matter may be “in dispute” before a defence is served. The question is determined from the case as a whole, including available pre-action…
7 Jun 2024
[2024] EWHC 1381 (KB) · High Court: King's Bench Division
An employer may suspend an employee pending investigation where a genuine complaint raises serious issues and a fair investigation would be difficult with the…
13 Feb 2023
[2023] EWCA Civ 121 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
For a single composite supply for VAT purposes, the predominant element test is the primary test where a predominant element can be identified. The assessment…
3
20 Oct 2022
[2022] EWCA Civ 1349 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
Contractual obligations are determined objectively by reading the agreement as a whole, in its factual and commercial context. Clear language must be applied…
24 Nov 2021
[2021] EWHC 3154 (QB) · High Court: Queen's Bench Division
In determining the meaning of passages in a book, the court must assess the broad impression made on the ordinary reasonable reader by the publication taken as…
1
27 Oct 2021
[2021] EWHC 3810 (KB) · High Court: King's Bench Division
A common-law claim for malicious falsehood requires pleaded pecuniary loss. The claimant must provide particulars with as much certainty and particularity as…
6 May 2021
[2021] EWHC 1193 (Comm) · High Court: Commercial Court
Where a document has been placed before a judge and specifically referred to in open court, the default position is that access should be permitted under the…
2
9 Dec 2020
[2020] EWHC 3375 (Comm) · High Court: Commercial Court
A process described as non-binding arbitration is not an arbitration agreement under Arbitration Act 1996, s 6(1), where the parties are not bound by the…
1
4 Dec 2019
[2019] EWHC 3287 (Ch) · High Court: Chancery Division
Whether a contractual payment obligation is independent or dependent depends on the true construction of the agreement as a whole. The court considers the…
1
20 Jun 2019
[2019] EWHC 1620 (Ch) · High Court: Chancery Division
A bankruptcy petition may be presented only in respect of a petitioning debt which is a liquidated sum. Contractual obligations to pay and to transfer assets…
2
18 Jan 2019
[2019] EWHC 48 (QB) · High Court: Queen's Bench Division
The natural and ordinary meaning of an allegedly defamatory book is the broad impression conveyed to the hypothetical reasonable reader by the whole…
163

Based on judgments published by The National Archives (Find Case Law) in which Harbottle & Lewis LLP is named as solicitors, counted under the firm's current name. The figures are minimums: not every judgment names the solicitors, and a judgment is counted only when we are confident who acted. The selection of cases listed here is limited, and does not include family, criminal or anonymised cases. Firm details include data from the Solicitors Regulation Authority. zoomLaw is independent and not connected with Harbottle & Lewis LLP. Something wrong or missing? Tell us. All law firms.