Practice areas
Courts
Counsel most often instructed
Judgments by year
Cases later courts cite most
Cases Hollingsworth Edwards Solicitors acted in that later judgments cite most often.
| Date | Case | Cited by |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Jun 2024 |
[2024] EWHC 1399 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
In an extradition Article 8 proportionality assessment, the court must weigh all relevant factors in the round. Passage of time may strengthen protected…
|
5 |
Recent cases
| Date | Case | Cited by |
|---|---|---|
| 1 Jul 2026 |
[2026] EWHC 1654 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
Permission to appeal in an extradition case should be refused where the proposed grounds have no realistic prospect of success. A forum-bar challenge requires…
|
|
| 12 Feb 2026 |
[2026] EWHC 286 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
On an appeal under the Extradition Act 2003, the High Court must decide whether the extradition judge made an error producing a wrong overall evaluation. It is…
|
1 |
| 30 Jan 2026 |
[2026] EWHC 140 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
For an accusation warrant, the particulars required by Extradition Act 2003 need not match an indictment or identify every act or item of evidence. They must…
|
|
| 3 Dec 2025 |
[2025] EWHC 3162 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
On an appeal against an extradition order, the court must apply the statutory conditions governing appellate intervention. Under Extradition Act 2003, section…
|
|
| 10 Nov 2025 |
[2025] EWHC 2932 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
In extradition cases engaging Article 8, the best interests of an affected child are an integral part of the proportionality assessment and a primary…
|
|
| 9 Apr 2025 |
[2025] EWHC 864 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
On an appeal under section 21 of the Extradition Act 2003, delay is not an automatic bar to extradition and does not operate as an on/off switch merely because…
|
2 |
| 3 Apr 2025 |
[2025] EWHC 809 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
Where a requested person establishes substantial grounds for believing that surrender would expose him to an Article 3 risk, the requesting state bears the…
|
|
| 26 Mar 2025 |
[2025] EWHC 722 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
On an extradition appeal, the High Court must determine whether the district judge reached the wrong decision and whether a different decision would have…
|
1 |
| 14 Mar 2025 |
[2025] EWHC 602 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
For the purposes of section 20 of the Extradition Act 2003, the relevant hearing is ordinarily the proceeding resulting in conviction and sentence. A later…
|
1 |
| 30 Jul 2024 |
[2024] EWHC 1954 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
In an extradition appeal based on fresh evidence, the court must determine Article 8 proportionality de novo on the material as it stands at the appeal. There…
|
|
| 18 Jun 2024 |
[2024] EWHC 1477 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
Under section 14 of the Extradition Act 2003, the passage of time alone rarely makes extradition oppressive. The court must focus on the consequences of the…
|
|
| 11 Jun 2024 |
[2024] EWHC 1399 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
In an extradition Article 8 proportionality assessment, the court must weigh all relevant factors in the round. Passage of time may strengthen protected…
|
5 |
Based on judgments published by The National Archives (Find Case Law) in which Hollingsworth Edwards Solicitors is named as solicitors, counted under the firm's current name. The figures are minimums: not every judgment names the solicitors, and a judgment is counted only when we are confident who acted. The selection of cases listed here is limited, and does not include family, criminal or anonymised cases. Firm details include data from the Solicitors Regulation Authority. zoomLaw is independent and not connected with Hollingsworth Edwards Solicitors. Something wrong or missing? Tell us. All law firms.