Law firm

Lee & Thompson LLP

Lee & Thompson LLP is named as solicitors in at least 56 UK judgments from 2006 to 2026, most often in intellectual property and commercial disputes.

56
judgments
6
in the last five years
8
in the Court of Appeal

Practice areas

  • Intellectual property18
  • Commercial disputes12
  • Media, defamation and privacy12
  • Trusts, wills and private client8
  • Civil liberties and human rights5
  • Family and children4
  • Company and partnership4
  • Real estate2

Courts

  • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)8
  • High Court48

Counsel most often instructed

  • Ian Mill12
  • Edmund Cullen7
  • Andrew Scott6
  • Tom Richards5
  • David Sherborne3
  • I. MILL3
  • Tom Blackburn3
  • Tom Weisselberg3

Judgments by year

  • 20261
  • 20251
  • 20243
  • 20231
  • 20220
  • 20212
  • 20201
  • 20193
  • 20184
  • 20178
  • 20163
  • 20157
  • 20144
  • 20133
  • 20126
  • 20110
  • 20102
  • 20092
  • 20083
  • 20071

Cases later courts cite most

Cases Lee & Thompson LLP acted in that later judgments cite most often.

Date Case Cited by
9 Oct 2019
[2019] EWCA Civ 1645 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
Joint authorship requires collaboration pursuant to a common design, authorial contributions sufficient to express each contributor’s own intellectual…
86
28 Feb 2013
[2013] EWHC 379 (Ch) · High Court: Chancery Division
Under section 97A of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, the High Court may order an internet service provider to block access to a website where the…
15
20 Feb 2012
[2012] EWHC 268 (Ch) · High Court: Chancery Division
Users of a peer-to-peer file-sharing service infringe copyright when they download protected works and make them available for uploading to other users. Such…
11
27 Jan 2017
[2017] EWCA Civ 29 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
On a capability application, a court should exclude a defamatory meaning only at a high threshold. It must exercise caution and adopt a generous view of the…
7
2 May 2012
[2012] EWHC 1152 (Ch) · High Court: Chancery Division
The High Court may grant a website-blocking injunction under section 97A of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 where the applicant establishes that…
6
18 Mar 2016
[2016] EWHC 575 (Ch) · High Court: Chancery Division
Copyright in broadcasts and films protects the broadcaster’s or producer’s investment. Whether a part is substantial is assessed quantitatively and…
5
31 May 2012
[2012] EWHC 1522 (Ch) · High Court: Chancery Division
There is one civil standard of proof: the balance of probabilities. Allegations of dishonesty do not require an enhanced standard, although inherent…
5
16 Apr 2019
[2019] EWCA Civ 677 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
Editorial discretion cannot make an interference with privacy lawful unless publication can be justified logically and rationally by the public interest…
4
11 Oct 2010
[2010] EWHC 2572 (QB) · High Court: Queen's Bench Division
For honest comment, the words must be comment rather than fact, based on facts which are true or protected by privilege, and represent an opinion which an…
4
8 Feb 2007
[2007] EWHC 134 (Comm) · High Court: Commercial Court
Summary judgment may determine a pure contractual construction issue where the court reaches a clear view and evidence cannot realistically produce a different…
4

Recent cases

Date Case Cited by
20 Apr 2026
[2026] EWHC 911 (KB) · High Court: King's Bench Division
A claimant alleging conversion of chattels must establish possession or an immediate right to possession. Ownership alone is neither necessary nor sufficient.…
13 May 2025
[2025] EWHC 1117 (Ch) · High Court: Chancery Division
On applications for strike-out and reverse summary judgment, the court must first ask whether the pleaded facts, assumed to be provable, disclose a complete…
20 Dec 2024
[2024] EWHC 3338 (KB) · High Court: King's Bench Division
On an application for summary judgment, the court may decide a short point of law or construction where the evidence is sufficient and the claim has no…
21 Jun 2024
[2024] EWHC 1554 (Ch) · High Court: Chancery Division
Whether an agent holds sale proceeds on trust depends on the parties’ objectively ascertained intention from the agreement and relevant surrounding…
28 Jun 2023
[2023] EWHC 1577 (Pat) · High Court: Patents Court
Redactions to a judgment are exceptional. They require powerful reasons supported by cogent evidence directed to the specific information. Redactions must be…
3
19 May 2021
[2021] EWHC 1242 (IPEC) · High Court: Intellectual Property Enterprise Court
In determining a consequential authorship credit, the court should make an overall merits-based assessment directed to the fairest and most accurate reflection…
11 Jan 2021
[2021] EWHC 24 (Ch) · High Court: Chancery Division
Joint authorship of a screenplay does not depend on who typed the words or had the final say. The question is whether the parties collaborated with a common…
4
17 Dec 2020
[2020] EWHC 3481 (Ch) · High Court: Chancery Division
A contractual restriction preventing a grantor from dealing with rights during an exclusive option period is breached by granting a competing option over the…
9 Oct 2019
[2019] EWCA Civ 1645 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
Joint authorship requires collaboration pursuant to a common design, authorial contributions sufficient to express each contributor’s own intellectual…
86
16 Apr 2019
[2019] EWCA Civ 677 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
Editorial discretion cannot make an interference with privacy lawful unless publication can be justified logically and rationally by the public interest…
4
1 Feb 2019
[2019] EWHC 165 (QB) · High Court: Queen's Bench Division
An oral contract may be made without written formalities. The absence of a written record concerns proof rather than validity. In a substantial commercial…
2
20 Sep 2018
[2018] EWHC 2542 (QB) · High Court: Queen's Bench Division
Disclosure must be confined to documents relevant to the issues for trial and proportionate to those issues. Documents directed solely to the general…

Earlier names

These figures include judgments naming firms that have since merged into, or been renamed as, Lee & Thompson LLP: Forbes Anderson Free.

Based on judgments published by The National Archives (Find Case Law) in which Lee & Thompson LLP is named as solicitors, counted under the firm's current name. The figures are minimums: not every judgment names the solicitors, and a judgment is counted only when we are confident who acted. The selection of cases listed here is limited, and does not include family, criminal or anonymised cases. Firm details include data from the Solicitors Regulation Authority. zoomLaw is independent and not connected with Lee & Thompson LLP. Something wrong or missing? Tell us. All law firms.