Law firm

Luke and Bridger Law

Luke and Bridger Law is named as solicitors in at least 13 UK judgments from 2023 to 2026, most often in public and administrative law and immigration and asylum.

13
judgments
13
in the last five years
3
in the Court of Appeal

Practice areas

  • Public and administrative law13
  • Immigration and asylum7
  • Civil liberties and human rights1

Courts

  • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)3
  • High Court10

Counsel most often instructed

  • Edward Nicholson4
  • Philip Rule4
  • Ramby de Mello3

Judgments by year

  • 20262
  • 20252
  • 20245
  • 20234

Cases later courts cite most

Cases Luke and Bridger Law acted in that later judgments cite most often.

Date Case Cited by
15 Mar 2024
[2024] EWHC 579 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
A systemic judicial review claim should generally be decided only where there are exceptional reasons to determine an academic issue and the issue is not…
13
21 Mar 2024
[2024] EWCA Civ 278 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
Eligibility under ARAP 3.6 requires each specified condition to be satisfied separately. Condition 1(iii) requires work alongside a UK government department…
11
31 Jul 2023
[2023] EWCA Civ 924 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
An age assessment interview must be fair, but fairness is fact-sensitive and does not require every procedural safeguard in every case. There is no rule of law…
9
13 Aug 2025
[2025] EWHC 2143 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
Under ARAP category 4, the applicant must show that the individual applicant, in the course of qualifying work, made a substantive and positive contribution to…
3

Recent cases

Date Case Cited by
10 Mar 2026
[2026] EWHC 529 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
At the permission stage, a judicial review claim must show an arguable ground with a realistic prospect of success. A challenge directed in substance at the…
17 Dec 2025
[2025] EWCA Civ 1648 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
In age-assessment judicial review, a strong prima facie case is not a separate gateway requirement for interim relief. The merits threshold is whether there is…
13 Aug 2025
[2025] EWHC 2143 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
Under ARAP category 4, the applicant must show that the individual applicant, in the course of qualifying work, made a substantive and positive contribution to…
3
29 Nov 2024
[2024] EWHC 3079 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
In an age-assessment judicial review, the court must distinguish a factual challenge to age from a conventional public-law challenge. Permission should be…
21 Mar 2024
[2024] EWCA Civ 278 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
Eligibility under ARAP 3.6 requires each specified condition to be satisfied separately. Condition 1(iii) requires work alongside a UK government department…
11
15 Mar 2024
[2024] EWHC 579 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
A systemic judicial review claim should generally be decided only where there are exceptional reasons to determine an academic issue and the issue is not…
13
12 Mar 2024
[2024] EWHC 553 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
A government resettlement scheme may be introduced incrementally where its wider operation remains work in progress. A stated aspiration does not necessarily…
1
6 Sep 2023
[2023] EWHC 2227 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
An order for interim relief requiring the Secretary of State to provide accommodation must be complied with by providing the accommodation ordered, not merely…
31 Jul 2023
[2023] EWCA Civ 924 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
An age assessment interview must be fair, but fairness is fact-sensitive and does not require every procedural safeguard in every case. There is no rule of law…
9
14 Jul 2023
[2023] EWHC 1795 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
Eligibility under the ARAP scheme must be assessed by applying the ordinary meaning of the words in ARAP 3.6. Conditions 1 and 2 are interdependent. For…
2

Based on judgments published by The National Archives (Find Case Law) in which Luke and Bridger Law is named as solicitors, counted under the firm's current name. The figures are minimums: not every judgment names the solicitors, and a judgment is counted only when we are confident who acted. The selection of cases listed here is limited, and does not include family, criminal or anonymised cases. Firm details include data from the Solicitors Regulation Authority. zoomLaw is independent and not connected with Luke and Bridger Law. Something wrong or missing? Tell us. All law firms.