Practice areas
Courts
Counsel most often instructed
Judgments by year
Recent cases
| Date | Case | Cited by |
|---|---|---|
| 28 Nov 2024 |
[2024] EWHC 3055 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
Where extradition engages a real risk of treatment contrary to article 3 of the ECHR, assurances must be sufficiently clear and effective to address the…
|
1 |
| 17 Sep 2024 |
[2024] EWHC 2351 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
A court will not extradite a person where prison conditions create a real risk of treatment contrary to article 3 of the ECHR, unless effective assurances…
|
2 |
| 6 Feb 2015 |
[2015] EWHC 217 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
In an appeal from a professional disciplinary decision, the court applied the objective test of whether a fair-minded and informed observer would conclude that…
|
|
| 22 Jan 2013 |
[2013] EWHC 310 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
In an extradition appeal, the warrant must be read as a whole when determining whether the conduct alleged constitutes an extradition offence. The omission of…
|
|
| 22 Jan 2013 |
[2013] EWHC 301 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
For an extradition offence, the warrant need only provide a sufficient factual indication of the alleged criminal conduct. An assertion that a person obtained…
|
|
| 4 Dec 2012 |
[2012] EWHC 4126 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
For the purpose of Extradition Act 2003, section 8B, a person is “in custody” when detained pursuant to a sentence, but not merely because the person remains…
|
|
| 9 Oct 2012 |
[2012] EWHC 2925 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
New evidence on an extradition appeal should be admitted only where it was unavailable at the original hearing and is capable of being decisive. Evidence that…
|
|
| 26 Sep 2012 |
[2012] EWHC 2813 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
In deciding whether to vary bail pending an extradition hearing, the court may maintain stringent conditions where the evidence establishes a considerable risk…
|
|
| 17 Jan 2012 |
[2012] EWHC 151 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
For conduct occurring outside the issuing territory, an offence may qualify for extradition under section 64(5) of the Extradition Act 2003 where no part of…
|
|
| 7 Jul 2011 |
[2011] EWHC 1962 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
On an appeal against extradition, fresh evidence may be admitted where it was unavailable, and could not with reasonable diligence have been obtained, at the…
|
2 |
| 2 Dec 2009 |
[2009] EWHC 3589 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
Section 25 of the Extradition Act 2003 imposes a very high threshold. Extradition is unjust or oppressive only where the person’s physical or mental condition…
|
1 |
| 15 Nov 2005 |
[2005] EWHC 2849 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
Extradition may be barred by delay only where returning the person would be unjust or oppressive. Unjustness principally concerns prejudice to the conduct of…
|
Based on judgments published by The National Archives (Find Case Law) in which Stephen Fidler & Co is named as solicitors, counted under the firm's current name. The figures are minimums: not every judgment names the solicitors, and a judgment is counted only when we are confident who acted. The selection of cases listed here is limited, and does not include family, criminal or anonymised cases. Firm details include data from the Solicitors Regulation Authority. zoomLaw is independent and not connected with Stephen Fidler & Co. Something wrong or missing? Tell us. All law firms.