Law firm

Taylor Rose

Taylor Rose is named as solicitors in at least 145 UK judgments from 2003 to 2026, most often in extradition and public and administrative law.

145
judgments
52
in the last five years
1
in the Supreme Court or Privy Council
25
in the Court of Appeal

Practice areas

  • Extradition70
  • Public and administrative law62
  • Family and children22
  • Civil liberties and human rights11
  • Trusts, wills and private client7
  • Clinical negligence5
  • Crime5
  • Commercial disputes4

Courts

  • Supreme Court1
  • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)24
  • Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)1
  • High Court119

Counsel most often instructed

  • David Williams5
  • Graeme Hall5
  • Louisa Collins5
  • Malcolm Hawkes5
  • Eliot Woolf4
  • Florence Iveson4
  • Philip Havers4
  • Roger Mallalieu4

Judgments by year

  • 20265
  • 202511
  • 202411
  • 202316
  • 20229
  • 202111
  • 202016
  • 20199
  • 20189
  • 201712
  • 20168
  • 20154
  • 20141
  • 20136
  • 20122
  • 20113
  • 20104
  • 20092
  • 20082
  • 20072

Cases later courts cite most

Cases Taylor Rose acted in that later judgments cite most often.

Date Case Cited by
9 Sep 2016
[2016] EWHC 2211 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
In extradition, the strong and continuing public interest in returning a requested person to face trial for serious offending will ordinarily prevail under…
18
23 Jul 2018
[2018] EWCA Civ 1726 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
Where a claim remains subject to the fixed recoverable costs regime and a defendant accepts the claimant’s Part 36 offer after the relevant period but before…
16
19 Dec 2011
[2011] EWCA Civ 1584 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
When a Part 36 offer is made and accepted before proceedings begin, the claimant may recover costs incurred in contemplation of proceedings which would…
13
15 Feb 2010
[2010] EWHC 244 (Ch) · High Court: Chancery Division
A director appointed by the board under article 95 of the 1948 Table A holds office only until the next annual general meeting and must then be re-elected.…
12
22 Jul 2010
[2010] EWCA Civ 844 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
Under rule 38.6 of the Civil Procedure Rules 1998, a claimant who discontinues ordinarily pays the defendant’s costs incurred before discontinuance. The…
9
9 Feb 2006
[2006] EWHC 159 (QB) · High Court: Queen's Bench Division
Where a claim falls within the fixed-cost scheme for specified low-value road-traffic cases, fixed recoverable costs and the prescribed success fee are payable…
8
12 Jul 2018
[2018] EWHC 1762 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
In extradition cases, Article 3 requires substantial grounds for believing that the requested person faces a real risk of inhuman or degrading treatment.…
8
20 Dec 2017
[2017] EWHC 3353 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
Where extradition interferes with private or family life, proportionality under Article 8 requires a structured balance sheet. The public interest in honouring…
7
12 Jan 2024
[2024] EWHC 33 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
In extradition cases engaging Article 3, a Council of Europe member state benefits from a presumption that it will comply with its Convention obligations. The…
6
10 Feb 2017
[2017] EWHC 191 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
The passage-of-time bar in section 14 of the Extradition Act 2003 is exceptional. Ordinary hardship caused by extradition is insufficient. The requested person…
6

Recent cases

Date Case Cited by
12 Oct 2026
[2026] EWHC 2577 (KB) · High Court: King's Bench Division
For libel preliminary issues, whether a statement is opinion is assessed from the actual publication, read as a whole and in context through the eyes of the…
30 Jul 2026
[2026] EWHC 2014 (KB) · High Court: King's Bench Division
A foreign judgment has no direct operation in England. It may be enforced only where the foreign court had jurisdiction under English conflict-of-laws…
7 May 2026
[2026] EWHC 1039 (Ch) · High Court: Chancery Division
Recognition of a foreign insolvency proceeding under the Cross-Border Insolvency Regulations 2006 is mandatory where article 17 is satisfied, subject to the…
20 Oct 2025
[2025] EWHC 2697 (Ch) · High Court: Chancery Division
An appellate court should interfere with a trial judge’s factual findings only where the conclusion was plainly wrong or no reasonable judge could have reached…
12 Jun 2025
[2025] EWHC 1439 (Comm) · High Court: Commercial Court
Without prejudice privilege is a fundamental protection and its exceptions must be applied narrowly. The exception for unambiguous impropriety requires clear…
9 May 2025
[2025] EWHC 1080 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
On an extradition appeal, the appellate court must identify an error which made the district judge’s decision wrong. It must not conduct a rehearing or merely…
1
27 Feb 2025
[2025] EWHC 415 (Ch) · High Court: Chancery Division
A freezing order may continue where the claimant shows a seriously arguable case, a real risk of dissipation and that it is just and convenient to grant…
21 Feb 2025
[2025] EWHC 329 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
For the purposes of the passage-of-time bar in section 14 of the Extradition Act 2003, a person may be a fugitive where, knowing that a legal process has begun…
21 Jan 2025
[2025] EWHC 79 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
Fugitive status does not require criminal proceedings to have begun, nor does it invariably require breach of an existing obligation. The question is whether…
20 Jan 2025
[2025] EWHC 76 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
For Extradition Act 2003, section 20, deliberate absence is assessed by reference to the trial process resulting in the conviction, including an appeal forming…
10 Jan 2025
[2025] EWHC 24 (Ch) · High Court: Chancery Division
A personal representative who applies for removal because they can no longer perform the role will ordinarily be entitled to an indemnity for the costs of the…
19 Dec 2024
[2024] EWHC 3303 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
In an extradition appeal based on Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights, the appellate court must focus on whether the extradition decision was…

Earlier names

These figures include judgments naming firms that have since merged into, or been renamed as, Taylor Rose: Taylor Rose TTKW, Tucker Turner Kingsley Wood & Co, McCullagh & Co, Kingsley Wood.

Based on judgments published by The National Archives (Find Case Law) in which Taylor Rose is named as solicitors, counted under the firm's current name. The figures are minimums: not every judgment names the solicitors, and a judgment is counted only when we are confident who acted. The selection of cases listed here is limited, and does not include family, criminal or anonymised cases. Firm details include data from the Solicitors Regulation Authority. zoomLaw is independent and not connected with Taylor Rose. Something wrong or missing? Tell us. All law firms.