Law firm

Troutman Pepper Locke UK LLP

Troutman Pepper Locke UK LLP is named as solicitors in at least 64 UK judgments from 2003 to 2025, most often in commercial disputes and insolvency and restructuring.

64
judgments
8
in the last five years
4
in the Supreme Court or Privy Council
13
in the Court of Appeal

Practice areas

  • Commercial disputes19
  • Insolvency and restructuring10
  • Company and partnership9
  • Intellectual property7
  • Cross-border disputes6
  • Insurance and reinsurance4
  • Media, defamation and privacy3
  • Employment3

Courts

  • Supreme Court2
  • Privy Council2
  • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)13
  • High Court47

Counsel most often instructed

  • Rhodri Davies4
  • Andrew Lodder3
  • Charles Graham3
  • Mark Engelman3
  • Paul Sinclair3

Judgments by year

  • 20260
  • 20252
  • 20241
  • 20232
  • 20223
  • 20211
  • 20201
  • 20192
  • 20180
  • 20172
  • 20161
  • 20151
  • 20147
  • 20135
  • 20129
  • 20114
  • 20101
  • 20094
  • 20081
  • 20072

Cases later courts cite most

Cases Troutman Pepper Locke UK LLP acted in that later judgments cite most often.

Date Case Cited by
14 Nov 2003
[2003] EWCA Civ 1630 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
The unambiguous impropriety exception to without prejudice privilege is confined to a clear abuse of the privileged occasion. An admission made in genuine…
43
2 Dec 2015
[2015] UKSC 71 · Supreme Court
A director’s fiduciary power must be exercised only for its proper purposes. The purpose is inferred from the provision’s terms, effect, mischief and business…
29
9 Oct 2014
[2014] EWCA Civ 1295 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
A party seeking fortification of a cross-undertaking in damages need not prove loss on the balance of probabilities. It must show a good arguable case by…
21
7 Mar 2007
[2007] EWHC 437 (Ch) · High Court: Chancery Division
Summary judgment should be refused where allegations of serious personal corruption depend materially on disputed witness evidence, hearsay, unexplored…
21
23 Feb 2024
[2024] EWCA Civ 175 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
When deciding whether non-disclosure justifies discharging a without-notice injunction, the overriding consideration is the interests of justice. The court…
17
17 Jul 2013
[2013] EWHC 2118 (Comm) · High Court: Commercial Court
A contractual success-fee mechanism may be varied by subsequent agreement or conduct where the parties objectively abandon the original method for calculating…
8
10 Mar 2017
[2017] EWHC 440 (Ch) · High Court: Chancery Division
For absolute-grounds examination, a broad specification must be assessed by reference to every product falling within its terms. A multipurpose product may…
7
16 Aug 2012
[2012] UKPC 30 · Privy Council
Registration under a Torrens system does not necessarily make title indefeasible against a transferee who acts in bad faith. The effect depends on the…
7
20 Feb 2014
[2014] EWHC 387 (Ch) · High Court: Chancery Division
In civil proceedings alleging bribery and economic loss, the claimant must prove both the unlawful conduct and loss caused by it. Where the alleged loss…
5
24 Nov 2025
[2025] UKSC 43 · Supreme Court
A person who purports to exercise a fiduciary power over another’s property may incur fiduciary duties even though no lawful power, title or possession exists.…
5

Recent cases

Date Case Cited by
24 Nov 2025
[2025] UKSC 43 · Supreme Court
A person who purports to exercise a fiduciary power over another’s property may incur fiduciary duties even though no lawful power, title or possession exists.…
5
23 May 2025
[2025] EWHC 1286 (Ch) · High Court: Chancery Division
A business deliberately conducted through companies will not ordinarily also constitute an overarching partnership. The court must identify the parties’…
2
23 Feb 2024
[2024] EWCA Civ 175 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
When deciding whether non-disclosure justifies discharging a without-notice injunction, the overriding consideration is the interests of justice. The court…
17
7 Sep 2023
[2023] EWHC 2205 (Ch) · High Court: Chancery Division
For service of a statutory demand, the creditor must do all that is reasonable to bring it to the debtor’s attention. The test does not require every…
12 Oct 2022
[2022] EWHC 2578 (Ch) · High Court: Chancery Division
A floating charge granted to a connected person during the relevant period is prima facie invalid under Insolvency Act 1986, but remains valid to the extent of…
1
8 Apr 2022
[2022] EWHC 855 (Ch) · High Court: Chancery Division
A company director may delegate particular functions where the delegation is reasonable, but remains responsible for supervising the delegate. A liquidator who…
2
29 Mar 2021
[2021] EWHC 719 (Ch) · High Court: Chancery Division
For bad faith under section 3(6) of the Trade Marks Act 1994, the applicant’s state of mind and intended use must be assessed against honest commercial…
25 Nov 2020
[2020] EWHC 3178 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
A contractual discretion must be construed by reference to the agreement as a whole and its objective meaning, rather than by a literal reading of one clause.…
2
7 Feb 2019
[2019] EWHC 215 (QB) · High Court: Queen's Bench Division
An indemnity costs order requires conduct that takes the case out of the norm. Unreasonable conduct must generally be unreasonable to a high degree; refusal of…
1
15 Jan 2019
[2019] EWHC 42 (QB) · High Court: Queen's Bench Division
Restrictive covenants are enforceable only so far as reasonably necessary to protect legitimate business interests assessed when the employment contract was…
3
10 Apr 2017
[2017] EWHC 713 (Ch) · High Court: Chancery Division
On an appeal from the Registrar of Trade Marks, the appellate court should respect primary factual findings and multifactorial evaluations. It may intervene…
10 Mar 2017
[2017] EWHC 440 (Ch) · High Court: Chancery Division
For absolute-grounds examination, a broad specification must be assessed by reference to every product falling within its terms. A multipurpose product may…
7

Earlier names

These figures include judgments naming firms that have since merged into, or been renamed as, Troutman Pepper Locke UK LLP: Kendall Freeman.

Based on judgments published by The National Archives (Find Case Law) in which Troutman Pepper Locke UK LLP is named as solicitors, counted under the firm's current name. The figures are minimums: not every judgment names the solicitors, and a judgment is counted only when we are confident who acted. The selection of cases listed here is limited, and does not include family, criminal or anonymised cases. Firm details include data from the Solicitors Regulation Authority. zoomLaw is independent and not connected with Troutman Pepper Locke UK LLP. Something wrong or missing? Tell us. All law firms.