Proceeds of Crime Act 2002, section 329

Acquisition, use and possession

Part 7 Money Laundering

(1)A person commits an offence if he—

(a)acquires criminal property;

(b)uses criminal property;

(c)has possession of criminal property.

(2)But a person does not commit such an offence if—

(a)he makes an authorised disclosure under section 338 and (if the disclosure is made before he does the act mentioned in subsection (1)) he has the appropriate consent;

(b)he intended to make such a disclosure but had a reasonable excuse for not doing so;

(c)he acquired or used or had possession of the property for adequate consideration;

(d)the act he does is done in carrying out a function he has relating to the enforcement of any provision of this Act or of any other enactment relating to criminal conduct or benefit from criminal conduct.

[F1137 (2A)Nor does a person commit an offence under subsection (1) if—

(a)he knows, or believes on reasonable grounds, that the relevant criminal conduct occurred in a particular country or territory outside the United Kingdom, and

(b)the relevant criminal conduct—

(i)was not, at the time it occurred, unlawful under the criminal law then applying in that country or territory, and

(ii)is not of a description prescribed by an order made by the Secretary of State.

(2B) In subsection (2A) “the relevant criminal conduct” is the criminal conduct by reference to which the property concerned is criminal property. F1137]

[F1138 (2C)A deposit-taking body [F1139 , electronic money institution or payment institutionF1139] that does an act mentioned in subsection (1) does not commit an offence under that subsection if—

(a)it does the act in operating an account maintained with it, and

(b)the value of the criminal property concerned is less than the threshold amount determined under section 339A for the act.F1138]

[F1140 (2D) A person (“P”) who does an act mentioned in subsection (1) does not commit an offence under that subsection if—

(a)P is carrying on business in the regulated sector that is not excluded business,

(b)P does the act, in the course of that business—

(i)in transferring or handing over to the customer or client property of, or owing to, a customer or client, and

(ii)for the purposes of the termination of P’s business relationship with the customer or client,

(c)the total value of the criminal property so transferred or handed over to the customer or client by P for those purposes is less than the threshold amount determined under section 339A for the act, and

(d)before the act is done, P has complied with the customer due diligence duties.

(2E)For the purposes of subsection (2D)—

(a) business is “excluded” if it is of a description specified in regulations made by the Secretary of State for the purposes of this subsection;

(b)a reference to property being transferred or handed over to the customer or client includes a reference to property being transferred or handed over to another person at the direction of the customer or client;

(c) “customer due diligence duties” means all duties imposed on P in relation to the customer or client by regulation 28(2), (3), (3A), (4), (8) or (10) of the Money Laundering, Terrorist Financing and Transfer of Funds (Information on the Payer) Regulations 2017 ( S.I. 2017/692 ) (customer due diligence measures). F1140]

[F1141 (2F) A person (“P”) who does an act mentioned in subsection (1) does not commit an offence under that subsection if—

(a)P is carrying on business in the regulated sector,

(b)P does the act in the course of that business, on behalf of a customer or client, in operating an account or accounts maintained with P or in connection with holding any property for the customer or client,

(c) at the time of the act, P knows or suspects that part but not all of the funds in the account or accounts, or of the property so held, is criminal property (“the relevant criminal property”),

(d)it is not possible, at the time the act takes place, to identify the part of the funds or property that is the relevant criminal property, and

(e)the value of the funds in the account or accounts, or of the property so held, is not, as a direct or indirect result of the act, less than the value of the relevant criminal property at the time of the act.

(2G)Where subsection (2F) applies—

(a)if P does the act in operating an account or accounts, the funds in the account or accounts immediately after the act are assumed to include the relevant criminal property, and

(b)if P does the act in connection with holding any property for the customer or client, such of that property as is held by P immediately after the act is assumed to include the relevant criminal property.F1141]

(3)For the purposes of this section—

(a)a person acquires property for inadequate consideration if the value of the consideration is significantly less than the value of the property;

(b)a person uses or has possession of property for inadequate consideration if the value of the consideration is significantly less than the value of the use or possession;

(c)the provision by a person of goods or services which he knows or suspects may help another to carry out criminal conduct is not consideration.

Definitions used in section 329 5

Deposit-taking body

(14) “Deposit-taking body” means—

(a)a business which engages in the activity of accepting deposits, ...

(b)the National Savings Bank , or

(c)a person specified, or of a description specified, in regulations made by the Treasury or the Secretary of State.

Defined in s.340(14) · see it in the full Act
Electronic money institution

(14C) “Electronic money institution” has the same meaning as in the Electronic Money Regulations 2011 (S.I. 2011/99) (see regulation 2 of those Regulations).

Defined in s.340(14C) · see it in the full Act
Payment institution

(16) “Payment institution” means an authorised payment institution or a small payment institution (each as defined in regulation 2 of the Payment Services Regulations 2017 (S.I. 2017/752) ).

Defined in s.340(16) · see it in the full Act
excluded

(a) business is “excluded” if it is of a description specified in regulations made by the Secretary of State for the purposes of this paragraph;

Defined in s.327(2E) · see it in the full Act
Business relationship

(17) “Business relationship” means a business, professional or commercial relationship between a person carrying on business in the regulated sector and a customer or client, where the relationship—

(a)arises out of the business of that person, and

(b)is expected by that person, at the time when contact is established, to have an element of duration.

Defined in s.340(17) · see it in the full Act

Cases considering section 329 70

El-Khouri v Government of the United States of America

[2025] UKSC 3 · 12 February 2025Limits

Interpreted as requiring acquisition, use or possession of criminal property itself to occur in the United Kingdom. Equivalent conduct occurring wholly abroad would not constitute this offence (see paras [74]-[82]).

Crown Prosecution Service v Aquila Advisory Ltd

[2021] UKSC 49 · 3 November 2021Limits

The court declined to decide whether assignment or enforcement of the constructive-trust interest constituted a money-laundering offence. Such considerations could not alter existing equitable ownership (see paras [84]-[86]).

The Director of Public Prosecutions v AA Bholah (Mauritius)

[2011] UKPC 44 · 20 December 2011Interprets

Section 329(1)(c) was considered with section 340(3) to support the conclusion that possession of criminal property does not require proof of the particular offence that generated it. The Board treated the statutory concept as non-specific (see paras [24]; [29]-[30]).

50 more judgments, and what each says about section 329, are in the case-law panel in the full Act.

Explanatory note

476.Section 329 unifies and replaces section 51 of the Drug Trafficking Act, section 93B of the Criminal Justice Act 1988, section 37 of the Criminal Law (Consolidation) (Scotland) Act 1995 and Article 45 of the Proceeds of Crime (Northern Ireland) Order 1996. As in sections 327 and328, by reason of section 340, this offence is only committed where a person knows or suspects that the property which is acquired etc constitutes or represents his own or another’s benefit from criminal conduct.

477.Again, the same defences against committing the offence apply as in sections 327 and 328. Additionally, the effect of the defence in subsection (2)(c) is that persons, such as tradesmen, who are paid for ordinary consumable goods and services in money that comes from crime are not under any obligation to question the source of the money. Subsection (3)(c) makes it clear that the provision of goods or services that help a person to carry out criminal conduct would not be a defence. However, section 329(3)(c) only negates the defence in section 329(2)(c) if the person who provides the goods or services knows or suspects that they will help the recipient to carry out criminal conduct.

All the explanatory notes for the Act

Amendments and notes

6 notes from legislation.gov.uk

Amendments

  1. F1137S. 329(2A)(2B) inserted (15.5.2006) by Serious Organised Crime and Police Act 2005 (c. 15), ss. 102(4), 178(8); S.I. 2006/1085, art. 3
  2. F1138S. 329(2C) inserted (1.7.2005) by Serious Organised Crime and Police Act 2005 (c. 15), ss. 103(4), 178(8); S.I. 2005/1521, art. 3(1)(c)
  3. F1139Words in s. 329(2C) inserted (29.6.2021) by Financial Services Act 2021 (c. 22), ss. 32(4), 49(2)(b)
  4. F1140S. 329(2D)(2E) inserted (26.10.2023) by Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Act 2023 (c. 56), ss. 182(4), 219(2)(f)
  5. F1141S. 329(2F)(2G) inserted (26.10.2023 for specified purposes, 15.1.2024 in so far as not already in force) by Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Act 2023 (c. 56), ss. 183(4), 219(1)(2)(b); S.I. 2023/1206, reg. 3(f)

Commencement

  1. I284S. 329 in force at 24.2.2003 by S.I. 2003/120, art. 2, Sch. (with arts. 3, 4) (as amended (20.2.2003) by S.I. 2003/333, art. 14)