Practice areas
Courts
Counsel most often instructed
Judgments by year
Cases later courts cite most
Cases Andrew Storch Solicitors acted in that later judgments cite most often.
| Date | Case | Cited by |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Feb 2025 |
[2025] EWCA Civ 109 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
An employer directly discriminates because of religion or belief if it dismisses an employee merely for expressing a protected belief, including because third…
|
9 |
| 26 Feb 2021 |
[2021] EWCA Civ 255 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
Disciplinary action because of a protected belief’s justifiably objectionable manifestation is distinct from action because the person holds or manifests the…
|
8 |
| 26 Feb 2021 |
[2021] EWCA Civ 254 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
Victimisation under section 27 of the Equality Act 2010 turns on the respondent’s operative reason for the detriment. A protected act need only be a…
|
7 |
| 31 Mar 2023 |
[2023] EWCA Civ 331 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
The High Court has jurisdiction in end-of-life proceedings to make reporting restriction orders protecting the integrity of proceedings and persons connected…
|
6 |
| 16 Jun 2023 |
[2023] EAT 89 · Employment Appeal Tribunal
Where an employer acts in response to an employee’s expression of protected religious or philosophical beliefs, the tribunal must first decide whether the…
|
4 |
| 6 Mar 2024 |
[2024] EAT 30 · Employment Appeal Tribunal
For direct discrimination, the tribunal must identify the decision-maker’s actual reason for the treatment. A protected belief may be an important part of the…
|
4 |
| 19 May 2020 |
[2020] EWHC 1546 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
The Secretary of State’s power under sections 1(3) and 1(3A) of the Abortion Act 1967 is broad enough to approve a class of places, including a pregnant…
|
3 |
Recent cases
| Date | Case | Cited by |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Mar 2026 |
[2026] EWCA Civ 253 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
For direct discrimination under the Equality Act 2010, the tribunal must identify the factual reason why for less favourable treatment. A protected belief may…
|
|
| 18 Nov 2025 |
[2025] EWHC 2987 (KB) · High Court: King's Bench Division
An appellate court reviewing proportionality must choose between review and fresh determination according to context. A review approach is ordinarily…
|
|
| 12 Feb 2025 |
[2025] EWCA Civ 109 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
An employer directly discriminates because of religion or belief if it dismisses an employee merely for expressing a protected belief, including because third…
|
9 |
| 28 Jan 2025 |
[2025] EWHC 151 (KB) · High Court: King's Bench Division
An arrest for a suspected public-order offence requires an honest suspicion, objectively reasonable grounds for that suspicion, and an objectively reasonable…
|
|
| 6 Mar 2024 |
[2024] EAT 30 · Employment Appeal Tribunal
For direct discrimination, the tribunal must identify the decision-maker’s actual reason for the treatment. A protected belief may be an important part of the…
|
4 |
| 15 Dec 2023 |
[2023] EWHC 3230 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
Judicial review proceedings are subject to ordinary procedural discipline. A claimant seeking to add a new ground after service must apply promptly for…
|
|
| 15 Dec 2023 |
[2023] EWHC 3229 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
A public spaces protection order may restrict conduct that is lawful and peaceful if the statutory threshold for anti-social behaviour is met. The conduct need…
|
|
| 16 Jun 2023 |
[2023] EAT 89 · Employment Appeal Tribunal
Where an employer acts in response to an employee’s expression of protected religious or philosophical beliefs, the tribunal must first decide whether the…
|
4 |
| 31 Mar 2023 |
[2023] EWCA Civ 331 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
The High Court has jurisdiction in end-of-life proceedings to make reporting restriction orders protecting the integrity of proceedings and persons connected…
|
6 |
| 25 Oct 2022 |
[2022] EWHC 2707 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
Judicial review is supervisory. It is not a vehicle for the court to resolve general disputes about education policy or competing evidence on multifactorial…
|
|
| 29 Jun 2022 |
[2022] EAT 99 · Employment Appeal Tribunal
A belief or lack of belief relied on as a protected characteristic must be identified with precision and meet the modest threshold in section 10 of the…
|
|
| 19 Nov 2021 |
[2021] EWHC 3100 (QB) · High Court: Queen's Bench Division
Convention rights to religious manifestation and freedom of expression protect a broad range of speech, including unpopular or offensive speech, but they are…
|
Based on judgments published by The National Archives (Find Case Law) in which Andrew Storch Solicitors is named as solicitors, counted under the firm's current name. The figures are minimums: not every judgment names the solicitors, and a judgment is counted only when we are confident who acted. The selection of cases listed here is limited, and does not include family, criminal or anonymised cases. Firm details include data from the Solicitors Regulation Authority. zoomLaw is independent and not connected with Andrew Storch Solicitors. Something wrong or missing? Tell us. All law firms.