Equality Act 2010, section 20

Duty to make adjustments

Part 2 Equality: key concepts

(1)Where this Act imposes a duty to make reasonable adjustments on a person, this section, sections 21 and 22 and the applicable Schedule apply; and for those purposes, a person on whom the duty is imposed is referred to as A.

(2)The duty comprises the following three requirements.

(3)The first requirement is a requirement, where a provision, criterion or practice of A's puts a disabled person at a substantial disadvantage in relation to a relevant matter in comparison with persons who are not disabled, to take such steps as it is reasonable to have to take to avoid the disadvantage.

(4)The second requirement is a requirement, where a physical feature puts a disabled person at a substantial disadvantage in relation to a relevant matter in comparison with persons who are not disabled, to take such steps as it is reasonable to have to take to avoid the disadvantage.

(5)The third requirement is a requirement, where a disabled person would, but for the provision of an auxiliary aid, be put at a substantial disadvantage in relation to a relevant matter in comparison with persons who are not disabled, to take such steps as it is reasonable to have to take to provide the auxiliary aid.

(6)Where the first or third requirement relates to the provision of information, the steps which it is reasonable for A to have to take include steps for ensuring that in the circumstances concerned the information is provided in an accessible format.

(7)A person (A) who is subject to a duty to make reasonable adjustments is not (subject to express provision to the contrary) entitled to require a disabled person, in relation to whom A is required to comply with the duty, to pay to any extent A's costs of complying with the duty.

(8)A reference in section 21 or 22 or an applicable Schedule to the first, second or third requirement is to be construed in accordance with this section.

(9)In relation to the second requirement, a reference in this section or an applicable Schedule to avoiding a substantial disadvantage includes a reference to—

(a)removing the physical feature in question,

(b)altering it, or

(c)providing a reasonable means of avoiding it.

(10)A reference in this section, section 21 or 22 or an applicable Schedule (apart from paragraphs 2 to 4 of Schedule 4) to a physical feature is a reference to—

(a)a feature arising from the design or construction of a building,

(b)a feature of an approach to, exit from or access to a building,

(c)a fixture or fitting, or furniture, furnishings, materials, equipment or other chattels, in or on premises, or

(d)any other physical element or quality.

Definitions used in section 20 2

substantial

“substantial” means more than minor or trivial;

Defined in s.212(1) · see it in the full Act
Relevant matter

(2) “Relevant matter” has the meaning given in section 67.

Defined in Sch.7 para.3(2) · see it in the full Act

Cases considering section 20 245

McCue (as guardian for Andrew McCue) v Glasgow City Council (Scotland)

[2023] UKSC 1 · 11 January 2023Interprets

The reasonable-adjustment duty is distinct from section 15 and may apply despite the absence of unfavourable treatment. The particular practice relied upon created no comparative disadvantage because it applied only to disabled people and potentially benefited them (see paras [64]-[75]). The subsection made Schedule 2 applicable to the Council’s provision of community care services (see para [64]). A claimant must identify a provision, criterion or practice which creates a substantial comparative disadvantage. An apparently neutral practice can qualify if it bears more heavily on disabled people. A practice confined to disabled people and affording them an additional deduction did not do so (see paras [65]-[74]).

FirstGroup Plc v Paulley

[2017] UKSC 4 · 18 January 2017

The provision requires reasonable steps to avoid a substantial disadvantage caused by a service provider’s provision, criterion or practice. The court applied it to determine whether the bus operator had to do more after an initial request to vacate the wheelchair space was refused. (see paras [23]; [66]-[69])

Rohit Sharma v University of Nottingham

[2025] EWCA Civ 1457 · 14 November 2025Defines

Section 20 is treated as defining the statutory duty to make reasonable adjustments, but it does not identify who owes that duty. The statutory duty is not the operative source of the obligation in judicial proceedings because judicial functions are excluded elsewhere in the Act (see paras [14]-[18]).

225 more judgments, and what each says about section 20, are in the case-law panel in the full Act.

Explanatory note

82.This section defines what is meant by the duty to make reasonable adjustments for the purposes of the Act and lists the Parts of the Act which impose the duty and the related Schedules which stipulate how the duty will apply in relation to each Part. The duty comprises three requirements which apply where a disabled person is placed at a substantial disadvantage in comparison with non-disabled people. The first requirement covers changing the way things are done (such as changing a practice), the second covers making changes to the built environment (such as providing access to a building), and the third covers providing auxiliary aids and services (such as providing special computer software or providing a different service).

83.The section makes clear that where the first or third requirements involves the way in which information is provided, a reasonable step includes providing that information in an accessible format.

84.It sets out that under the second requirement, taking steps to avoid the disadvantage will include removing, altering or providing a reasonable means of avoiding the physical feature, where it would be reasonable to do so.

85.It also makes clear that, except where the Act states otherwise, it would never be reasonable for a person bound by the duty to pass on the costs of complying with it to an individual disabled person.

86.This section replaces similar provisions in the Disability Discrimination Act 1995. However, the Act makes some changes to provide consistency across the reasonable adjustment provisions. It contains only one threshold for the reasonable adjustment duty – “substantial disadvantage” – in place of the two thresholds in the Disability Discrimination Act 1995. It also reflects current practice by applying the third requirement explicitly to employment. And it introduces consistency of language by referring to “provision, criterion or practice” rather than “practice, policy or procedure” used in some provisions in the Disability Discrimination Act 1995. It also introduces greater transparency with the express references to providing information in accessible formats and to not passing on the costs of an adjustment which are explained above.

All the explanatory notes for the Act