Law firm

Howe+Co Solicitors

Howe+Co Solicitors is named as solicitors in at least 52 UK judgments from 2003 to 2025, most often in immigration and asylum and public and administrative law.

52
judgments
5
in the last five years
23
in the Court of Appeal

Practice areas

  • Immigration and asylum30
  • Public and administrative law24
  • Civil liberties and human rights11
  • Media, defamation and privacy8
  • Civil fraud and asset recovery2
  • Crime1
  • Real estate1
  • Housing1

Courts

  • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)23
  • High Court23
  • Upper Tribunal6

Counsel most often instructed

  • Mark Henderson10
  • Christopher Jacobs8
  • Anthony Hudson4
  • Raphael Jesurum4
  • Adam Tear3
  • C Jacobs3

Judgments by year

  • 20260
  • 20251
  • 20242
  • 20231
  • 20221
  • 20211
  • 20202
  • 20194
  • 20182
  • 20172
  • 20161
  • 20155
  • 20142
  • 20131
  • 20125
  • 20113
  • 20106
  • 20091
  • 20085
  • 20075

Cases later courts cite most

Cases Howe+Co Solicitors acted in that later judgments cite most often.

Date Case Cited by
20 Apr 2021
[2021] EWCA Civ 567 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
Whether allegedly defamatory words convey fact or opinion depends on how they would strike the ordinary reasonable reader or viewer in context. A broadcast…
68
24 Apr 2020
[2020] EWHC 977 (QB) · High Court: Queen's Bench Division
The natural and ordinary meaning of an allegedly defamatory publication is assessed objectively. The publisher’s intended meaning and individual readers’…
23
19 Dec 2019
[2019] EWHC 3547 (QB) · High Court: Queen's Bench Division
A contributor to a defamatory publication is liable where it knowingly authorises publication of its own defamatory statement in the relevant context. It is…
23
30 Sep 2008
[2008] EWHC 2261 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
A published immigration discretion must state its scope clearly enough to guide officials, applicants and appellate bodies. It is unlawful where its stated…
13
9 Jul 2012
[2012] UKUT 196 (IAC) · Upper Tribunal: Immigration and Asylum Chamber
In a discretionary deportation appeal, the Tribunal must scrutinise the factual basis on which the Secretary of State considers deportation conducive to the…
6
14 Dec 2007
[2007] EWCA Civ 1326 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
A policy ordinarily creates a legitimate expectation that it will be applied to persons within its scope, while cases outside it must still receive due…
6

Recent cases

Date Case Cited by
28 May 2025
[2025] EWHC 1312 (KB) · High Court: King's Bench Division
Summary judgment in a disease claim should be reserved for cases where the requirements of CPR 24.2 can readily be established. The court must not conduct a…
1
18 Dec 2024
[2024] EWHC 3283 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
When an inquiry chair decides whether to fund legal representation, the statutory discretion must be exercised fairly and with regard to avoiding unnecessary…
19 Jan 2024
[2024] EWHC 62 (KB) · High Court: King's Bench Division
An unincorporated association is not a legal entity and cannot be sued in its own name. A representative claim under CPR 19.8 requires the representative and…
1
17 Mar 2023
[2023] EWHC 778 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
A local housing authority must comply with its allocation scheme, but a scheme may confer discretion to make exceptional provision. A claimant cannot…
23 Mar 2022
[2022] EWHC 666 (QB) · High Court: Queen's Bench Division
In assessing general damages for defamation, the court must make a broad and holistic assessment. It should consider the gravity of the allegations, the extent…
20 Apr 2021
[2021] EWCA Civ 567 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
Whether allegedly defamatory words convey fact or opinion depends on how they would strike the ordinary reasonable reader or viewer in context. A broadcast…
68
10 Jul 2020
[2020] EWHC 1848 (QB) · High Court: Queen's Bench Division
In a defamation reference-innuendo claim, the court asks whether a reasonable person possessing the pleaded extrinsic facts would understand the words to refer…
24 Apr 2020
[2020] EWHC 977 (QB) · High Court: Queen's Bench Division
The natural and ordinary meaning of an allegedly defamatory publication is assessed objectively. The publisher’s intended meaning and individual readers’…
23
19 Dec 2019
[2019] EWHC 3547 (QB) · High Court: Queen's Bench Division
A contributor to a defamatory publication is liable where it knowingly authorises publication of its own defamatory statement in the relevant context. It is…
23
16 Nov 2018
[2018] EWHC 3139 (QB) · High Court: Queen's Bench Division
Where an injunction may restrain freedom of expression or assembly, the claimant must show that it is more likely than not that relief will be granted at…
8 Mar 2018
[2018] EWHC 454 (Admin) · High Court: Administrative Court
Immigration detention must remain justified throughout the period of detention. A high risk of absconding is important, but it does not automatically outweigh…
13 Dec 2017
[2017] EWCA Civ 2106 · Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
In Gurkha historic-injustice claims under Article 8, dependency at the date of application is the critical issue. The family-life or private-life label may be…

Based on judgments published by The National Archives (Find Case Law) in which Howe+Co Solicitors is named as solicitors, counted under the firm's current name. The figures are minimums: not every judgment names the solicitors, and a judgment is counted only when we are confident who acted. The selection of cases listed here is limited, and does not include family, criminal or anonymised cases. Firm details include data from the Solicitors Regulation Authority. zoomLaw is independent and not connected with Howe+Co Solicitors. Something wrong or missing? Tell us. All law firms.