| Rank | Firm | Cases | Judgments | Judgments in the Supreme Court, Privy Council or Court of Appeal |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Capsticks | 61 | 63 | 2 |
| 2 | Weightmans | 18 | 22 | 3 |
| 3 | Clyde & Co | 9 | 9 | 1 |
| 4 | Kingsley Napley LLP | 8 | 12 | 4 |
| =5 | HF | 7 | 9 | 2 |
| =5 | Blake Morgan | 7 | 7 | 1 |
| 7 | Browne Jacobson LLP | 6 | 15 | |
| =8 | Hill Dickinson | 5 | 8 | |
| =8 | JMW Solicitors LLP | 5 | 5 | |
| =10 | Bates Wells | 4 | 5 | |
| =10 | DLA Piper UK LLP | 4 | 5 | |
| =10 | gunnercooke LLP | 4 | 4 | 1 |
| =13 | Backhouse Jones Solicitors | 3 | 3 | |
| =13 | Hogan Lovells Cadwalader | 3 | 3 | 2 |
| =13 | Irwin Mitchell | 3 | 3 | 1 |
Listed firms can show their place on their own website: each firm's profile page has a ranking badge to copy.
Firms are ranked by the number of cases from 2022–2026 in this area in which judgments name them as solicitors, under their current name (judgments naming a firm that has since merged count towards the firm it joined). Several judgments in the same case, such as interim rulings, a later judgment on costs or an appeal, count as one case: judgments are linked by the court's case number and by appeals, or failing that by the parties' names. Only firms named in at least 3 cases are ranked, and equal counts share a place. This measures how often a firm acts in reported cases, not their outcome. Counts are minimums: they come from judgments published by The National Archives (Find Case Law), not every judgment names the solicitors, and a judgment counts only when we are confident who acted. Areas are assigned from each judgment's court and subject matter, and a judgment can fall in two areas. Firm details include data from the Solicitors Regulation Authority. zoomLaw is independent of every firm listed. Something wrong? Tell us.