(1)Subject to the provisions of this Part of this Act—
(a)a person must not use a motor vehicle on a road or other public place unless there is in force in relation to the use of the vehicle by that person such a policy of insurance ... as complies with the requirements of this Part of this Act, and
(b)a person must not cause or permit any other person to use a motor vehicle on a road or other public place unless there is in force in relation to the use of the vehicle by that other person such a policy of insurance ... as complies with the requirements of this Part of this Act.
(2)If a person acts in contravention of subsection (1) above he is guilty of an offence.
(3)A person charged with using a motor vehicle in contravention of this section shall not be convicted if he proves—
(a)that the vehicle did not belong to him and was not in his possession under a contract of hiring or of loan,
(b)that he was using the vehicle in the course of his employment, and
(c)that he neither knew nor had reason to believe that there was not in force in relation to the vehicle such a policy of insurance ... as is mentioned in subsection (1) above.
(4)This Part of this Act does not apply to invalid carriages.
Cases considering section 143 45
[2013] UKSC 56 · 31 July 2013Limits
Uninsured use of a motor vehicle is a strict-liability qualifying offence under section 3ZB. Its commission does not by itself make the driver criminally responsible for a death arising from a collision (see paras [4]; [17]; [28]).
[2016] EWCA Civ 1202 · 30 November 2016Interprets
The court applied the prohibition on using or permitting another person to use a motor vehicle without compliant third-party insurance. It treated the separate wording for use and permission as material to the resulting liability (see paras [4]; [14]; [20]).
The court relied on the express distinction between using a vehicle and causing or permitting another person to use it. Permission alone therefore did not amount to use for section 145 purposes (see para [20]).
[2012] EWCA Civ 1267 · 11 October 2011Interprets
The court held that the statutory obligation is imposed on the vehicle user to ensure insurance is in force for the actual use of the vehicle. A use falling outside an effective policy limitation is uninsured for that use. (see paras [36]; [38]; [45])
Section 143(1) was construed as requiring the user to have a policy covering the use actually made of the vehicle. It did not impose a corresponding obligation on the insurer to cover every possible use. (see paras [36]; [38])
The court confirmed that use outside the cover required by section 143(1) remains subject to the statutory criminal sanction, even though an accident victim may be compensated through the statutory or MIB scheme. (see para [65])
25 more judgments, and what each says about section 143, are in the
case-law panel in the full Act.