| Date | Case | Cited by |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Oct 2026 |
[2026] EAT 155
Under section 26(4) of the Equality Act 2010, the tribunal asks whether the claimant actually perceived the conduct as having a proscribed effect and, if so…
|
|
| 9 Oct 2026 |
[2026] EAT 153
Under the Equality Act 2010, a proposed adjustment must be assessed against the particular substantial disadvantage. An adjustment request may inform what the…
|
|
| 5 Oct 2026 |
[2026] EAT 152
For discrimination arising from disability, the employer must know, or reasonably be expected to know, the facts constituting the relevant disability, but need…
|
|
| 2 Oct 2026 |
[2026] EAT 151
Before making an unless order, an Employment Tribunal must assess whether the dismissal it stipulates would be a proportionate consequence of material…
|
|
| 1 Oct 2026 |
[2026] EAT 150
A qualifying disclosure must contain enough factual content and specificity to be capable of tending to show a listed failure, or to be reasonably believed to…
|
|
| 28 Sep 2026 |
[2026] EAT 147
The EAT will generally not entertain an argument that was not advanced before the Employment Tribunal. It may permit a new point only in exceptional…
|
|
| 25 Sep 2026 |
[2026] EAT 149
Assignment for a TUPE transfer is a fact-sensitive question of whether an employee was assigned to the transferring organisational framework on a non-temporary…
|
|
| 24 Sep 2026 |
[2026] EAT 145
A tribunal need not formally dispose of an outstanding reasonable-adjustments application before considering strike-out where the applicant’s non-attendance…
|
|
| 24 Sep 2026 |
[2026] EAT 142
A tribunal assessing compensation for an unappealed finding of failure to make reasonable adjustments may interpret the earlier decision by reasonable…
|
|
| 23 Sep 2026 |
[2026] EAT 146
An employment tribunal may refuse an amendment where it is not sufficiently clear and particularised to permit fair consideration, assessment of…
|
|
| 21 Sep 2026 |
[2026] EAT 144
A Tribunal considering a deposit application arising from refusal of national security clearance must make its own assessment of the discrimination claim. It…
|
|
| 21 Sep 2026 |
[2026] EAT 131
Under the Equality Act 2010, whether conduct is unwanted is assessed from the worker’s subjective response. For harassment by effect, perception is only one…
|
1 |
| 18 Sep 2026 |
[2026] EAT 140
When deciding whether it is just and equitable to extend time for a discrimination complaint, a tribunal may consider the age of the factual issues that an…
|
|
| 17 Sep 2026 |
[2026] EAT 141
Under section 98 of the Employment Rights Act 1996, a tribunal must identify the employer’s actual factual reason for dismissal, or the principal reason if…
|
|
| 17 Sep 2026 |
[2026] EAT 139
All litigants before the EAT, represented or not, must comply with its Rules and Practice Direction. A litigant using generative AI remains responsible for…
|
1 |
| 16 Sep 2026 |
[2026] EAT 137
Aggravated damages in discrimination cases are compensatory and may be awarded only where an additional aggravating feature, beyond the injury already…
|
|
| 15 Sep 2026 |
[2026] EAT 132
In deciding whether a conduct dismissal is fair, a tribunal must assess the disciplinary process as a whole, including any appeal. Procedural unfairness may…
|
|
| 10 Sep 2026 |
[2026] EAT 135
Where medical evidence about a disabled party’s impairments is relevant to a tribunal’s procedural discretion, the tribunal must consider its bearing on past…
|
|
| 9 Sep 2026 |
[2026] EAT 134
A perversity appeal succeeds only where an overwhelming case shows that no reasonable tribunal, properly appreciating the evidence and law, could have reached…
|
|
| 8 Sep 2026 |
[2026] EAT 148
Extending time for a late EAT appeal requires a fact-sensitive assessment of the explanation for default, whether it amounts to a good excuse and, if not…
|
|
| 7 Sep 2026 |
[2026] EAT 133
Under section 15 of the Equality Act 2010, an employer’s explanation must identify a reason that was operative when the unfavourable treatment occurred. A…
|
|
| 7 Sep 2026 |
[2026] EAT 130
Under the Equality Act 2010, market-rate pay differences are neither automatically justified nor automatically discriminatory. A tribunal may find particular…
|
|
| 3 Sep 2026 |
[2026] EAT 127
For ordinary unfair dismissal, the Tribunal must identify the facts or beliefs that caused the employer to dismiss and, where several matters operated…
|
1 |
| 28 Aug 2026 |
[2026] EAT 129
Where claims raise common or related issues of fact or law, an Employment Tribunal may allow them to be defended in a single response form under Rule 16(3)…
|
|
| 26 Aug 2026 |
[2026] EAT 124
A Certification Officer may strike out a complaint about the meaning of union rules only where the wording and relevant context leave no reasonably arguable…
|
|
| 20 Aug 2026 |
[2026] EAT 126
Before striking out a claim for the way proceedings were conducted, a tribunal must give the party a reasonable opportunity to make representations. Whether…
|
|
| 10 Aug 2026 |
[2026] EAT 119
For interim relief in a protected-disclosure dismissal claim, Employment Rights Act 1996, section 129(1), requires a claimant to show a pretty good chance of…
|
|
| 6 Aug 2026 |
[2026] EAT 136
The EAT’s discretion to extend time for an appeal is strict but not inflexible. It must weigh the explanation for default, whether it is an acceptable excuse…
|
|
| 5 Aug 2026 |
[2026] EAT 116
Rule 64 permits an employment tribunal to make a consent order on terms agreed in writing at any time during a claim, or orally at a hearing. An unenforceable…
|
|
| 4 Aug 2026 |
[2026] EAT 99
In a misconduct dismissal case, an Employment Tribunal reviews whether the employer’s belief and investigation were reasonable. It must not decide the alleged…
|
|
| 4 Aug 2026 |
[2026] EAT 84
A political, single-issue or research-informed belief may qualify as a philosophical belief if it meets the modest statutory threshold; those features alone do…
|
|
| 4 Aug 2026 |
[2026] EAT 128
The duty to make reasonable adjustments rests on an employer or principal, but that does not categorically bar a claim against an employee. Under the Equality…
|
|
| 4 Aug 2026 |
[2026] EAT 118
An employment tribunal deciding direct discrimination need not always construct a hypothetical comparator or decide less favourable treatment as a separate…
|
|
| 30 Jul 2026 |
[2026] EAT 115
Under Equality Act 2010, consent is relevant, but not conclusive, to whether sexual conduct is unwanted and to the statutory assessment of its effect.…
|
|
| 29 Jul 2026 |
[2026] EAT 94
An appellant who wishes to adopt arguable errors identified in an EAT rule 3(7) determination should generally apply promptly to amend the grounds. Amendment…
|
|
| 28 Jul 2026 |
[2026] EAT 114
A party who makes a timely request under rule 62(3) of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 for written reasons following an oral decision is…
|
|
| 27 Jul 2026 |
[2026] EAT 112
A tribunal must identify the information actually conveyed in a whistleblowing disclosure. It may consider closely related passages in the same report and…
|
|
| 27 Jul 2026 |
[2026] EAT 107
An Employment Tribunal is not generally required to raise Convention rights of its own motion in an unfair dismissal claim. It may err by failing to address an…
|
|
| 24 Jul 2026 |
[2026] EAT 113
An Employment Tribunal errs in law by striking out a direct discrimination claim about the retraction or lapse of a job offer without considering whether an…
|
|
| 23 Jul 2026 |
[2026] EAT 125
An employment tribunal must determine the claims in an ET1 by objectively reading the statement of case as a whole and in context. It need not reconstruct a…
|
|
| 23 Jul 2026 |
[2026] EAT 111
Apparent bias is assessed by asking whether a fair-minded and informed observer, considering all relevant circumstances, would see a real possibility of bias.…
|
|
| 22 Jul 2026 |
[2026] EAT 110
When assessing costs, a tribunal may consider third-party resources only to the extent they affect the paying party’s own ability to pay. It must examine…
|
|
| 22 Jul 2026 |
[2026] EAT 106
The statutory right to be accompanied at a disciplinary or grievance hearing depends on both the worker being required or invited to attend and making a…
|
|
| 17 Jul 2026 |
[2026] EAT 105
A tribunal should not strike out a discrimination claim as having no reasonable prospect merely because the alleged acts involved different people or lacked…
|
|
| 16 Jul 2026 |
[2026] EAT 104
A tribunal deciding a constructive dismissal claim based on a course of conduct must consider the employer’s conduct cumulatively against the implied term of…
|
|
| 16 Jul 2026 |
[2026] EAT 102
Liability under section 145B of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 requires an offer to a union member, a prohibited result and the…
|
|
| 13 Jul 2026 |
[2026] EAT 103
For discrimination arising from disability under the Equality Act 2010, the tribunal must identify what caused the unfavourable treatment and ask whether that…
|
|
| 10 Jul 2026 |
[2026] EAT 101
Under section 98(4) of the Employment Rights Act 1996, fairness in a conduct dismissal is assessed against the range of reasonable responses, including the…
|
|
| 9 Jul 2026 |
[2026] EAT 117
When reviewing refusal of an amendment, the EAT may intervene where the tribunal mischaracterises the proposed change and assesses prejudice without sufficient…
|
|
| 9 Jul 2026 |
[2026] EAT 108
An employment tribunal assessing a preparation time order must determine a reasonable and proportionate number of hours and multiply that figure by the…
|
|
| 7 Jul 2026 |
[2026] EAT 121
When compensation is reconsidered because payment of an award will affect a claimant’s Universal Credit, the tribunal must assess mitigation more widely and…
|
|
| 2 Jul 2026 |
[2026] EAT 97
A wasted costs order requires findings that a representative acted improperly, unreasonably or negligently, that the conduct caused unnecessary costs, and that…
|
|
| 1 Jul 2026 |
[2026] EAT 122
For a case listed before 29 October 2024, panel composition may be reviewed where a material change in circumstances permits it. Where panel members were not…
|
|
| 29 Jun 2026 |
[2026] EAT 93
Whether conduct amounts to participation in trade union activities under Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992, section 152, is a…
|
|
| 26 Jun 2026 |
[2026] EAT 95
For victimisation, the tribunal must identify the specific act relied on and assess whether it was done for the purposes of or in connection with the Equality…
|
|
| 19 Jun 2026 |
[2026] EAT 90
In direct discrimination claims, a tribunal must apply the two-stage burden of proof in Equality Act 2010, section 136, unless it makes positive findings about…
|
|
| 18 Jun 2026 |
[2026] EAT 109
A tribunal may decide a strike-out application by reference to a final, definitive list of issues where the claimant has clarified and agreed the claims after…
|
|
| 16 Jun 2026 |
[2026] EAT 92
For discrimination arising from disability and reasonable-adjustments claims, an employer must assess knowledge by reference to the facts constituting…
|
|
| 16 Jun 2026 |
[2026] EAT 91
Employment Tribunal pleadings must be read fairly and in their full context. A claim may be apparent from the pleaded facts even where it is expressed…
|
|
| 16 Jun 2026 |
[2026] EAT 88
An extension of time for an Employment Appeal Tribunal appeal is exceptional. The applicant must provide a full and honest explanation, show a good excuse for…
|
|
| 15 Jun 2026 |
[2026] EAT 89
Whether conduct amounts to gross misconduct justifying summary dismissal requires an objective assessment of all relevant circumstances. Pressure or duress…
|
|
| 12 Jun 2026 |
[2026] EAT 86
Compensation for unlawful discrimination is assessed on tortious principles. Loss must flow directly and naturally from the discriminatory act, but reasonable…
|
1 |
| 11 Jun 2026 |
[2026] EAT 85
An Employment Tribunal considering an application to extend time for presenting a response must assess all relevant circumstances under the overriding…
|
|
| 9 Jun 2026 |
[2026] EAT 82
An Employment Tribunal has a discretionary power to make a witness order. The applicant must show that the proposed witness can apparently give relevant…
|
|
| 8 Jun 2026 |
[2026] EAT 81
When identifying complaints at a case-management hearing, an Employment Tribunal must distinguish clarification of existing pleadings from the introduction of…
|
|
| 2 Jun 2026 |
[2026] EAT 80
An Employment Tribunal does not err in law by finding that conduct arising in a trade union context was objectively separable from protected trade union…
|
|
| 1 Jun 2026 |
[2026] EAT 73
For an unlawful deduction claim, a bonus is wages properly payable once the worker has a legal entitlement to it. The entitlement may arise before the amount…
|
|
| 29 May 2026 |
[2026] EAT 78
For an appeal to the Employment Appeal Tribunal, failure to provide the judgment and reasons is not ordinarily a minor error where those documents are required…
|
|
| 29 May 2026 |
[2026] EAT 77
For direct discrimination based on a manifestation of belief, the conduct must be intimately linked to the protected belief. A normative belief about how…
|
|
| 22 May 2026 |
[2026] EAT 76
An appeal to the Employment Appeal Tribunal must identify a concise and arguable error of law. Grounds that merely challenge findings of fact, re-argue the…
|
1 |
| 22 May 2026 |
[2026] EAT 74
When assessing contributory conduct, an Employment Tribunal must distinguish the basic award from the compensatory award. Conduct before dismissal may be…
|
|
| 20 May 2026 |
[2026] EAT 75
Under regulation 3(2) of the Fixed-Term Employees (Prevention of Less Favourable Treatment) Regulations 2002, less favourable treatment concerning the…
|
|
| 19 May 2026 |
[2026] EAT 83
Time limits in the Employment Appeal Tribunal remain important, but state immunity cases engage an exceptional consideration. Where an appeal raises a…
|
|
| 19 May 2026 |
[2026] EAT 63
Where claims are automatically struck out for non-payment of deposit orders, the Employment Tribunal need not consider general relief-from-sanctions factors if…
|
|
| 18 May 2026 |
[2026] EAT 72
An Employment Tribunal must address the mandatory stages of an application for reconsideration. It must decide whether the application is in time and, if not…
|
|
| 14 May 2026 |
[2026] EAT 87
The requirement to be given an itemised pay statement under section 8 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 does not require physical delivery. Electronic…
|
|
| 12 May 2026 |
[2026] EAT 71
Section 47 of the Equality Act 2010 is a jurisdictional gateway which extends the Act’s protection to self-employed barristers. It does not create separate…
|
|
| 12 May 2026 |
[2026] EAT 68
In a direct discrimination claim, an Employment Tribunal must identify the alleged discriminatory act and the person said to have done it. It must then decide…
|
|
| 12 May 2026 |
[2026] EAT 66
Under rule 37(1)(d), an employment tribunal must first determine whether a claim has not been actively pursued and then exercise its discretion in all the…
|
|
| 7 May 2026 |
[2026] EAT 70
At a Rule 3(10) hearing, a respondent has no general right to make submissions. The hearing is a short assessment of whether grounds rejected at the sift stage…
|
|
| 1 May 2026 |
[2026] EAT 54
A qualifications body applies a competence standard when it requires a candidate to achieve the stated standard, even if it wrongly administers the process for…
|
|
| 30 Apr 2026 |
[2026] EAT 69
An appeal from an Employment Tribunal case-management order requires the written record of the order; written reasons are required only if available. The…
|
|
| 30 Apr 2026 |
[2026] EAT 65
The strict approach to extending time for instituting an appeal to the Employment Appeal Tribunal does not govern a late respondent’s answer. A late answer…
|
|
| 30 Apr 2026 |
[2026] EAT 64
An Employment Tribunal determines time-limit issues on the case advanced in the pleadings, evidence and submissions. It is not required, and would be wrong, to…
|
|
| 28 Apr 2026 |
[2026] EAT 58
Section 111A of the Employment Rights Act 1996 protects pre-termination negotiations only in proceedings for ordinary unfair dismissal. Where mixed claims are…
|
|
| 23 Apr 2026 |
[2026] EAT 61
Compensation for discrimination must restore the claimant’s net position but for the unlawful conduct. A state benefit received solely because of injury caused…
|
|
| 22 Apr 2026 |
[2026] EAT 60
An application to extend time for a request for a rule 3(10) hearing requires a judicial and fact-sensitive assessment. The applicant must provide an…
|
|
| 22 Apr 2026 |
[2026] EAT 59
Where an ET1 and early-conciliation certificate record different names because the claimant changed name between them, the tribunal must consider the exception…
|
|
| 21 Apr 2026 |
[2026] EAT 62
In deciding why an employer imposed alleged detriments, an Employment Tribunal may assess the credibility and reliability of the evidence and may determine…
|
|
| 21 Apr 2026 |
[2026] EAT 53
An Employment Tribunal may exclude a proposed issue where it is an attempt to reopen factual findings that were necessary to an earlier preliminary…
|
|
| 17 Apr 2026 |
[2026] EAT 56
Counsel appointed by the chair of a public inquiry is not the holder of a public office under section 50(2) of the Equality Act 2010 unless the appointment is…
|
|
| 17 Apr 2026 |
[2026] EAT 55
Where contractual documents direct a defined group of employees to a separate handbook for details of overtime payments, the natural construction may exclude…
|
|
| 15 Apr 2026 |
[2026] EAT 52
In employment proceedings, Investigatory Powers Act 2016 section 56(1)(b) must, so far as possible, be read compatibly with fair-trial rights. It applies where…
|
|
| 8 Apr 2026 |
[2026] EAT 48
A Henderson v Henderson abuse allegation requires a broad, merits-based assessment of all the circumstances. It does not follow merely because a matter could…
|
|
| 2 Apr 2026 |
[2026] EAT 50
Under rule 37(1)(e), whether a claim can still be fairly tried is a fact-sensitive evaluative judgment. A tribunal must consider practical measures that could…
|
|
| 27 Mar 2026 |
[2026] EAT 47
For a claim under section 15 of the Equality Act 2010, a tribunal must distinguish between the employer’s subjective reason for the unfavourable treatment and…
|
1 |
| 25 Mar 2026 |
[2026] EAT 46
In assessing compensation for unlawful discrimination, an employment tribunal must construct the counterfactual in which none of the discriminatory wrongs…
|
|
| 20 Mar 2026 |
[2026] EAT 43
An employment tribunal must determine claims which emerge from a fair and objective reading of the statements of case. It has no general duty to identify and…
|
|
| 17 Mar 2026 |
[2026] EAT 42
A tribunal must take account of any relevant provision of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992, section 207, but it need not expressly…
|
|
| 12 Mar 2026 |
[2026] EAT 40
A teacher formerly paid at the highest point of the abolished post-threshold scale has no automatic contractual right to the maximum of the successor upper pay…
|
|
| 10 Mar 2026 |
[2026] EAT 39
An appeal alleging perversity succeeds only where an overwhelming case shows that no reasonable employment tribunal, properly applying the evidence and law…
|
|
| 9 Mar 2026 |
[2026] EAT 38
An Employment Tribunal determining interim relief for an alleged protected-disclosure dismissal must make an expeditious, summary assessment of whether the…
|
|
| 5 Mar 2026 |
[2026] EAT 45
An Employment Tribunal considering a reconsideration application must follow the mandatory two-stage process in rule 72 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of…
|
|
| 5 Mar 2026 |
[2026] EAT 36
An Employment Tribunal must exercise case-management discretion by reference to the arguments and evidence before it, the actual effect of the proposed order…
|
|
| 4 Mar 2026 |
[2026] EAT 35
Under Rule 33, an EAT review is exceptional and cannot be used to re-argue a case or correct an error of law properly raised on appeal. However, the interests…
|
|
| 3 Mar 2026 |
[2026] EAT 34
Under section 33 of the Employment Tribunals Act 1996, a restriction of proceedings order may be made where a person has habitually and persistently, and…
|
|
| 27 Feb 2026 |
[2026] EAT 32
For justification under section 19 of the Equality Act 2010, the tribunal must balance the employer’s real needs against the discriminatory effect of the PCP…
|
|
| 26 Feb 2026 |
[2026] EAT 33
An Employment Tribunal reconsideration application must follow the mandatory sequence in rule 70 of the Employment Tribunal Rules 2024. At the initial sift…
|
1 |
| 24 Feb 2026 |
[2026] EAT 30
For a disclosure to qualify under section 43B of the Employment Rights Act 1996, a tribunal must first determine the worker’s actual belief that the disclosure…
|
|
| 20 Feb 2026 |
[2026] EAT 28
In a victimisation claim, the question is whether a protected act was an effective cause of the detriment. Where an employer relies on a breakdown in working…
|
|
| 16 Feb 2026 |
[2026] EAT 29
In a direct religion or belief discrimination claim, a tribunal must identify each effective reason for the impugned treatment and analyse it separately. A…
|
|
| 13 Feb 2026 |
[2026] EAT 31
Under section 98 of the Employment Rights Act 1996, fairness requires assessment of the whole dismissal process, including any internal appeal. A failure to…
|
|
| 11 Feb 2026 |
[2026] EAT 27
An employment contract cannot be transferred from one employer to another at common law merely because the original employer relinquishes practical control and…
|
|
| 11 Feb 2026 |
[2026] EAT 17
In a conduct dismissal, the tribunal must identify the employer’s actual reason, or principal reason, for dismissal. It must not substitute a reason which the…
|
1 |
| 6 Feb 2026 |
[2026] EAT 26
An employment tribunal must assess allegations of direct discrimination by reference to the evidence and the way the case is advanced as a whole. It may treat…
|
|
| 30 Jan 2026 |
[2026] EAT 24
The burden-of-proof inquiry under section 136 of the Equality Act 2010 is fact-sensitive. It must not be resolved by mechanically applying a general rule about…
|
|
| 29 Jan 2026 |
[2026] EAT 25
A person may fall within the protection for part-time workers where, viewed as a whole, the relationship is not substantially different from an employment…
|
1 |
| 29 Jan 2026 |
[2026] EAT 23
Rule 76 of the Employment Tribunal Rules 2013 imposes a two-stage process. The tribunal must first decide whether a threshold in rule 76(1) is met. It must…
|
|
| 29 Jan 2026 |
[2026] EAT 22
An employment tribunal must identify a party’s case by an objective reading of its statements of case. It may clarify and refine claims already advanced…
|
|
| 28 Jan 2026 |
[2026] EAT 21
An Employment Tribunal may prefer one witness’s evidence to another’s after assessing the evidence as a whole. It must not apply an inflexible rule which…
|
|
| 28 Jan 2026 |
[2026] EAT 20
An Employment Appeal Tribunal should normally follow a prior EAT decision on the same point of law. The convention applies in state-immunity cases. It may be…
|
1 |
| 26 Jan 2026 |
[2026] EAT 19
An Employment Tribunal determining whether communications are protected disclosures must assess the statutory elements with sufficient clarity to show which…
|
|
| 22 Jan 2026 |
[2026] EAT 14
An Employment Tribunal must determine claims which emerge clearly from an objective analysis of the parties’ statements of case. It does not have a general…
|
|
| 21 Jan 2026 |
[2026] EAT 16
For Employment Rights Act 1996, section 44(1)(a), an employee is not designated to undertake health and safety activities merely because ordinary duties…
|
|
| 21 Jan 2026 |
[2026] EAT 15
A contract worker cannot use section 41 of the Equality Act 2010 to complain against a principal about pay fixed under the worker’s contract with the supplier.…
|
|
| 19 Jan 2026 |
[2026] EAT 12
For capability dismissals, the relevant work is ordinarily the work which the employee is contractually employed to perform. A progression-based requirement to…
|
1 |
| 16 Jan 2026 |
[2026] EAT 5
When strike-out is sought because a witness under oath discussed the case, the tribunal should ordinarily ascertain what was discussed. The content is…
|
|
| 15 Jan 2026 |
[2026] EAT 13
When exercising the discretion under section 123(1)(b) of the Equality Act 2010, an employment tribunal must assess all factors relevant to whether an…
|
|
| 14 Jan 2026 |
[2026] EAT 10
For discrimination arising from disability, the question is whether the unfavourable treatment was because of something arising in consequence of disability.…
|
|
| 13 Jan 2026 |
[2026] EAT 37
An Employment Tribunal must apply the repudiatory-breach test, and give adequate reasons for its application, to each alleged breach of the implied term of…
|
|
| 13 Jan 2026 |
[2026] EAT 11
A COT3 agreement is construed objectively as a contract. The court must read its terms as a whole, in their factual and commercial context, but the precise…
|
|
| 12 Jan 2026 |
[2026] EAT 8
In a misconduct dismissal, fairness remains governed by Employment Rights Act 1996, section 98. The tribunal must assess the process as a whole, including any…
|
1 |
| 12 Jan 2026 |
[2026] EAT 4
An Employment Appeal Tribunal costs application requires a two-stage inquiry. The tribunal must first find conduct within the threshold in rule 34A, including…
|
|
| 9 Jan 2026 |
[2026] EAT 6
Under section 136 of the Equality Act 2010, the tribunal must decide at the first stage whether the facts found could reasonably support the particular…
|
1 |
| 8 Jan 2026 |
[2026] EAT 3
A purported withdrawal of an Employment Tribunal claim is effective only if the claimant’s communication, read fairly in its full context, is clear…
|
1 |
| 7 Jan 2026 |
[2026] EAT 7
An Employment Appeal Tribunal costs order under rule 34A requires a two-stage decision. The Tribunal must first find that proceedings were unnecessary…
|
|
| 7 Jan 2026 |
[2026] EAT 2
The Employment Appeal Tribunal's power to extend time under rule 37 is a broad discretion. It must be exercised on the particular facts, without treating…
|
|
| 2 Jan 2026 |
[2026] EAT 1
An employment tribunal may assess the forensic effect of delay by making an evaluative assessment of the quality and reliability of oral evidence. It need not…
|